바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073

사서교사의 도서관 활용 수업을 위한 과제 중심의 교수설계 연구

A Study on the Task-Centered Instructional Design for the Library-Based Instruction of Teacher-Librarians

정보관리학회지, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2008, v.25 no.4, pp.347-361
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.4.347
함명식 (서울맹학교)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

본고는 ‘정보와 도서관’ 교육과정의 목표와 교수설계 절차에 입각하여 사서교사의 도서관 활용 수업을 위한 협동수업 개념틀을 제시하기 위한 것이다. 현장 사서교사들의 상세화된 협동수업 지도안은 점차 활성화되고 있으나 교수설계 절차 등 수업이론을 적용한 연구는 아직 미비한 실정이다. 이러한 측면에서 사서교사의 협동수업을 위한 수업이론 및 방법 등은 중요한 의미를 갖는다. 사서교사의 협동수업 지도안은 ‘정보와 도서관’ 교육과정의 목표와 교수설계 절차에 입각하여 개발되어야 한다. 교육과정의 목표는 정보과제를 중심으로 정보이용과정을 반영한 것이다. 본고는 교육과정의 목표와 교수설계 절차에 입각하여 그 원리를 적용한 협동수업 개념틀을 제시하고, 이를 기반으로 현장 사서교사들이 상세화된 협동수업 지도안을 개발할 수 있도록 한다.

Abstract

This study is to present cooperative instructional concept framework for the library-based instruction of teacher-librarians, based on ‘Information and the Library’ curriculum and instructional design procedure. The development of cooperative instructional units has been initiated in the school libraries, but the research based on instructional theories, including instructional design, is lacking. In this aspect, instructional theories and methodologies for the cooperative instruction of teacher-librarians are important. The cooperative instructional units for teacher-librarians should be developed by ‘Information and the Library’ curriculum and instructional design procedures. The objectives of the curriculum emphasize information use process based on information task. This study is to present cooperative instructional concept framework, and to help teacher-librarians develop specific cooperative instructional units based on the framework.

참고문헌

1

강인애. (1996). 구성주의 모델들의 특징과 차이점: 인지적 도제 이론, 상황적 학습이론, 인지적 유연성 이론을 중심으로. 교육공학 연구, 12(1), 3-23.

2

강인애. (1998). 구성주의 교육학:교육과학사.

3

함명식. (2002). 정보와 도서관 (중학교 교과서):대한교과서.

4

함명식. (2006). 문헌정보교육학개론:태일사.

5

AASL & AECT. (1998). Information Literacy Standards for Student Learning:ALA.

6

Blumenfeld, P. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psych, 26(3), 369-398.

7

Brown, J. S. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.

8

Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt University. (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cogni- tion. Educational Researcher, 19(3), 2-10.

9

Cognition and Technology Group of Vanderbilt. (1992). Technology and the design of generative learning environment:Lawrence Erlbaum Asso- ciates..

10

Collins, A. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathe- matics, in: Kno- wing, Learning, and Instruction: Essay in Honor of Robert Glaser:Lawrence Erlbaum Asso- ciates.

11

Dick, W. (1996). The Systematic Design of Instruction. 4th ed:Harper Collins.

12

Eisenberg, M. B. (1996). Helping with Home- work:Syracuse University.

13

Global SchoolNet Foundation. Introduc- tion to project-based learning. http://www.globalschoolhouse.org/web/pbl/pblintro.htm.

14

Merrill,M.D. (1992). Constructivism and in- structional design, in: Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation:Law- rence Erlbaum Associates.

15

Perkins,D.N. (1991). Technology meets con- structivism: Do they make a marriage?. Educational Technology, 31(5), 18-23.

16

Savery, J. R. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Edu- cational Technology, 35(5), 31-38.

17

Spiro, R. J. (1991). Cognitive flexi- bility, constructivism and hypertext: Random access instruction for advan- ced knowledge acquisition in ill-struc- tured domains, in: Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Con- versation:Law- rence Erlbaum Associates.

18

Wilson, B. (1991). Cognitive app- renticeships: An instructional design review. AECT Proceedings, , 946-956.

정보관리학회지