바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.25 No.4
Citation Share

Analyzing the Network of Academic Disciplines with Journal Contributions of Korean Researchers

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2008, v.25 no.4, pp.327-345
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.4.327

(2008). Analyzing the Network of Academic Disciplines with Journal Contributions of Korean Researchers. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 25(4), 327-345, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.4.327
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The main purposes of this study are to construct a Korean science network from journal contributions data of Korean researchers, and to analyze the structure and characteristics of the network. First of all, the association matrix of 140 scholarly domains are calculated based on the number of contributions in common journals, and then the Pathfinder network algorithm is applied to those matrix. The resulting network has several hubs such as ‘Biology’, ‘Korean Language & Linguistics’, ‘Physics’, etc. The entropy formula and several centrality measures for the weighted networks are adopted to identify the centralities and interdisciplinarity of each scholarly domain. In particular, the date hubs, which have several weak links, are successively distinguished by local and global triangle betweenness centrality measures.

keywords
bibliometrics, science network, scientography, weighted network, centrality measures, date hub, 계량서지학, 학문 네트워크, 과학지도학, 가중 네트워크, 중심성 척도, 데이트 허브, bibliometrics, science network, scientography, weighted network, centrality measures, date hub

Reference

1.

이재윤. (2006). 지적 구조의 규명을 위한 네트워크 형성 방식에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(2), 333-355.

2.

이재윤. (2006). 계량서지적 네트워크 분석을 위한 중심성 척도에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(3), 191-214.

3.

이재윤. (2007). 국내 광역 과학 지도 생성 연구. 정보관리학회지, 24(3), 363-383.

4.

Boyack, K. W. (2005). Mapping the backbone of sci- ence. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351-374.

5.

Csermely,P. (2006). Weak Links: Stabilizers of Complex Systems from Proteins to Social Networks:Springer-Verlag.

6.

de Nooy, W. (2005). Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek:Cambridge University Press.

7.

Garfield,E. (1994). Scientography: Mapping the tracks of science. Current Con- tents: Social & Behavioral Sciences, 7, 5-10.

8.

Granovetter,M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.

9.

Han, J. D. J. (2004). Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein-protein interaction network. Nature, 430, 88-93.

10.

Mantegna,R.N. (1999). Hierarchical structure in financial markets. European Physical Journal B, 11(1), 193-197.

11.

Moya-Anegón, F. (2004). A new technique for building maps of large scientific do- mains based on the cocitation of classes and categories. Scientometrics, 61(1), 129-145.

12.

Newman,M.E.J. (2004). Analysis of weighted networks. Physical Review E, 70, 056131-.

13.

Price, D. J. DeSolla. (1966). The science of sci- entists. Medical Opinion and Review, 1(10), 88-97.

14.

Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1990). Pathfinder Associative Networks: Studies in Knowl- edge Organization:Ablex.

15.

Small, H. (1985). The geog- raphy of science: disciplinary and na- tional mappings. Journal of Informa- tion Science, 11, 147-159.

16.

Vargas-Quesada, B. (2007). Visualizing the Structure of Sci- ence:Springer-Verlag..

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy