바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Journal Citation Analysis for Library Services on Interdisciplinary Domains: A Case Study of Department of Biotechnology, Y University

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2008, v.25 no.4, pp.283-308
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.4.283


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

In this study, we testify that network structural attributes of a citation network can explain other aspects of journal citation behaviors and the importances of journals. And we also testify various citation impact indicators of journals including JIF and h-index to verify the difference among them especially focused on their ability to explain an institution's local features of citation behaviors. An institutional citation network is derived using the articles published in 2006-2007 by biotechnology faculties of Y University. And various journal citation impact indicators including JIF, SJR, h-index, EigenFactor, JII are gathered from different service sites such as Web of Science, SCImago, EigenFactor.com, Journal-Ranking.com. As a results, we can explain the institution's 5 research domains with inter-citation network. And we find that the co-citation network structural features can show explanations on the patterns of institutional journal citation behavior different from the simple cited frequency of the institution or patterns based on general citation indicators. Also We find that journal ranks with various citation indicators have differences and it implies that total-based indices, average-based indices, and hybrid index(h-index) explain different aspects of journal citation pattern. We also reveal that the coverage of citation DB doesn't be a matter in the journal ranking. Analyzing the citation networks derived from an institution's research outputs can be a useful and effective method in developing several library services.

keywords
network analysis, citation analysis, cocitation, journal citation indicators, JIF, library services, 네트워크 분석, 인용분석, 동시인용, 인용지수, JIF, 도서관 서비스, network analysis, citation analysis, cocitation, journal citation indicators, JIF, library services

Reference

1.

고성순. (2005). 인용문헌 분석을 이용한 외국학술잡지 이용행태 분석. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 36(1), 441-457.

2.

김용학. (2007). 사회 연결망 분석(개정판):박영사.

3.

김판준. (2007). 연구 영역 분석을 위한 디스크립터 프로파일링에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 24(4), 285-303.

4.

김홍렬. (2005). 생명과학 학술지의 인용 분석 연구. 정보관리학회지, 22(3), 85-102.

5.

노경란. (2006). 특허분석을 통한 과학기술자의 과학논문 인용행태에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 23(3), 223-240.

6.

유재옥. (1993). 도서관학 학술지에 나타난 인용행태 분석. 정보관리학회지, 10(2), 145-167.

7.

이재윤. (2006). 지적 구조의 규명을 위한 네트워크 형성 방식에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(2), 333-355.

8.

이재윤. (2006). 계량서지적 네트워크 분석을 위한 중심성 척도에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(3), 191-214.

9.

이재윤. (2007). 클러스터링 기반 네트워크 생성 알고리즘 (147-154). 제14회 한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집.

10.

이재윤. (2007). 지적 구조 분석을 위한 MDS 지도 작성 방식의 비교 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 41(2), 335-357.

11.

정영미. (2005). 정보검색연구:구미무역(주)출판부.

12.

Ball,P. (2006). Prestige is factored into journal ratings. Nature, 439(16), 770-771.

13.

Bonacich,P. (1972). Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2, 113-120.

14.

Bonacich,P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1170-1182.

15.

Bollen, J. (2006). Journal status. Scien- tometrics, 69(3), 669-687.

16.

Borgatti, S. P. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis:Analytic Technologies..

17.

EigenFactor.org. http://www.eigenfactor.org.

18.

de Nooy, W. (2005). Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek:Cambridge Uni- versity Press.

19.

Freeman,L.C. (1979). Centrality in social net- works conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-239.

20.

Hascall, V. C. JBC on journal ranking. http://www.jbc.org/misc/journalranking.shtml.

21.

Hirsch,J.E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 102(46), 16569-16572.

23.

Leydesdorff,L. (2007). Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Sci- ence and Technology, 58(9), 1303-1319.

24.

Narin, F. (1972). Interrelationships of scientific jour- nals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 23, 323-331.

25.

Sabidussi,G. (1966). The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika, 31, 581-603.

26.

SCImago. (2007). SJR-SCImago Journal & Coun- try Rank. http://www.scimagojr.com.

27.

Wasserman, S. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications:Cambridge University Press.

28.

Xing, W. (2004). Weighted Pagerank algorithm (305-314). Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference on Communication Networks and Services Research(CNSR’04).

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management