바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.25 No.4
Citation Share

A Study on Evaluation of Korean Collection of North America: Focused on the A University

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2008, v.25 no.4, pp.269-281
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.4.269

(2008). A Study on Evaluation of Korean Collection of North America: Focused on the A University. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 25(4), 269-281, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.4.269
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This paper evaluated the collection development of the Korean collection at the A university over the several decade. Compared against the ACRL standard Formula A, the result demonstrated that the Korean library collection is still needed to increase Korean collection to support Korean-related program and Korean community in the area. When we share western language materials in the library as the same area studies resources, we can evaluate Korean studies collection as Level B. Comparison with similar institutions (ARL comparisons) shows that the collection is the middle among 15 universities which provide Korean programs. The situation for Korean resources at the A university is needed to get more support from Korean institutes and Korean societies to keep up with the Korean collection for academics and regional community users as well.

keywords
한국학 장서, 장서평가, ACRL 표준, ARL 비교값, Korean collection, collection evaluation, ACRL standard, formula A, ARL comparisons, Korean collection, collection evaluation, ACRL standard, formula A, ARL comparisons

Reference

1.

송영희. (2008). 디지털시대의 장서관리 개정판:도서관협회.

2.

윤충남. (2004). 하바드 옌칭 한국관 자료 연구:경인문화사.

3.

최형근. (2005). 북미 대학도서관의 한국학장서가 당면하고 있는 현실적인 문제. 도서관문화, 46(12), 52-58.

4.

ACRL Board & ALA Standards Committee. (1995). Standards for college libraries 1995 edition. RL NEWS, , -.

5.

Baker, S. L. (1991). The Measurement and evaluation of library services 2nd.:Infor- mation Resources.

6.

CEAL Statistics Committee, 2005-06. (2007). Council on East Asian Libraries Statistics 2005- 2006 for North American Institutions. http://www.lib.ku.edu/ceal/.

7.

Center for Korean Studies. (2007). Mission of UCLA's Korean Studies Program. http://www.international.ucla.edu/korea/mission.asp.

8.

Center for Korean Studies. (2007). Overview of UCLA's Korean Studies Program. http://www.international.ucla.edu/korea/.

9.

Clouston,John. (1995). How much is enough: establishing a corridor of adequacy in library acquisitions. Collection Manage- ment, 9(3-4), 9-.

10.

Duncan, John. (2003). Summary report on the UCLA Korean Studies Program. www.kf.or.kr.

11.

East Asian Library. (2007). Richard C. Rudolph East Asian Library. http://www2.library.ucla.edu/libraries/EastAsian/6469.cfm.

12.

Kao Chiang. (2000). Empirical standards for university libraries in Taiwan. Libri, 51, 17-26.

13.

KCCNA. (2007). Korean Collections Consortium of North America: cooperative collec- tion development program of Korean studies resources supported by the Korea Foundation. http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/KConsort/about.html.

14.

Kim,Ik-Sam. (1984). The Korean collection at the UCLA Oriental Library. Korean and Korean-American Studies Bulletin, 1(1), -.

15.

Rahman,M.Z. (2005). The library of the ISTAC: an evaluation of a decade of the collection development. Library Reviews, 54(1), 21-27.

16.

The Korean Collection Consortium of North America. (2007). Korean Stu- dies resources supported by the Korea Foundation. http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/KConsort/about.html.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy