바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073

사회네트워킹 사이트 이용자 지속의도에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 탐구

Exploring Factors Influencing Users' Continuance Intention in Social Networking Sites

정보관리학회지, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2008, v.25 no.4, pp.205-226
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.4.205
박지홍 (연세대학교)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

The success of social networking sites (SNSs) may depend on many factors. Continuance use of SNSs is one of these. Especially, in the Web environment where users can leave one service with a single mouse click, maintaining existing members cost much time and efforts. Without continuance use of SNSs, SNS-based service would not create any value. This study focused on identifying factors influencing users’ continuance intention in SNSs. Based on relevant literature review, six influencing factors were initially identified. They were reputation, relational capital, knowledge quality, compatibility, personalization, and satisfaction. Web-based ques- tionnaire survey was conducted and a total of 325 usable responses were collected. Reliability test and two rounds of exploratory factor analyses resulted in identifying five factors. The relationship between the factors and the continuance intention was tested by using multiple regression analyses. The analyses revealed that satisfaction was the most significant factor. Knowledge quality and relational capital also had significant effects while reputation and personalization did not have significant effect on continuance intention. Instead, reputation and personalization showed significance in influencing satisfaction.

참고문헌

1

Altman, E. (1998). Service quality and customer satisfaction do matter. American Libraries, 29(7), 53-54.

2

Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding informa- tion systems continuance: An expectation- confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351-370.

3

Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance. Decision Support Sys- tems, 32, 201-214.

4

boyd, D. M. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communi- cation, 13(1), -.

5

Brazelton, J. (2003). Creating a knowledge-sharing community: If you build it, will they come?. Communications of the ACM, 46(2), 23-25.

6

Buskens,V. (2002). Social networks and trust:Kluwer Academic Publishers.

7

Castaneda, J. A. (2007). Web Acceptance Model (WAM): Moder- ating effects of user experience. Information & Management, 44(4), 384-396.

8

Chen,I.Y.L. (2007). The factors influencing members’ continuance intentions in professional virtual communities-A longitudinal study. Journal of Information Science, 33(4), 451-467.

9

Cohen,J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences (2nd Ed.):Lawrence Erlbaum.

10

Davis,F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of infor- mation technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.

11

DeLone, W. H. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Man- agement Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.

12

Erdfelder, E. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 28, 1-11.

13

Facebook App (Facebook) Librarian: Books, Scholarly Resources, Facts+Stuff, Ask A Librarian. 2007. http://onlinesocialnetworks.blogspot.com/2007/07/facebook-app-facebook-librarian-books.html.

14

Frias-Martinez, E. (2007). Automatic cognitive style identification of digital library users for personalization. Journal of the American Society for In- formation Science and Technology, 58(2), 237-251.

15

Friends: Social Networking Sites for Engaged Library Services. http://onlinesocialnetworks.blogspot.com/.

16

Hair, J. F. (1992). Multivariate data analysis with readings:Macmillan.

17

Kim, K. H. (2007). Cying for me, Cying for us: Relational dialectics in a Korean social network site. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 13(1), -.

18

Li, C. (2008). Groundswell: winning in a world transformed by social tech- nologies:Harvard Business Press.

19

Lin,N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action:Cam- bridge University Press..

20

Lippert S. K. (2005). Utilization of information technology: Examining cognitive and experiential factors of post-adoption behavior. IEEE Transactions on Enginee- ring Management, 52(3), 363-381.

21

Lin,H. F. (2007). "The role of online and offline features in sustaining virtual communities:An empirical study."Internet Research,17(2),119-138. Internet Research, 17(2), 119-138.

22

Marchionini, G. (1998). Interfaces and tools for the library of congress national digital library program. Information Processing & Management, 34(5), 535-555.

23

Moon, Y. J. (2006). A study on the effect of trust of online community on community loyalty. Journal of the Korea E-Commerce Research Academy, 7(1), 3-22.

24

Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory:McGraw-Hill..

25

오동근. (2005). 공공도서관의 서비스품질이 이용자만족도와 충성도에 미치는 영향. 정보관리학회지, 22(4), 61-78.

26

Oleck,J. (2007). Libraries use MySpace to attract teens: More and more libraries are taking advantage of the popular social networking site. School Library Journal, , -.

27

Parthasarathy, M. (1998). Understanding post-adoption behavior in the context of online services. Information Systems Research, 9(4), 362-379.

28

Piccoli, G. (2003). Trust and the unin- tended effects of behavior control in virtual teams. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 365-295.

29

Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.

30

Ridings, C. M. (2004). Virtual community attraction: Why people hang out online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(1), -.

31

Rogers,E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations:Free Press..

32

Spiller, J. (2007). Post- adoption behavior of users of Internet service provider. Information & Management, 44(6), 513-523.

33

Tiwana, A. (2005). Continuance in expertise-sharing networks: A social pers- pective. IEEE Transactions on Engineer- ing Management, 52(1), 85-101.

34

Thong, J.Y.L. (2006). The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation-confirmation model for infor- mation technology continuance. Interna- tional Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(9), 799-810.

35

University of Minnesota. (2008). June 21. Educational benefits of social networking sites unco- vered. ScienceDaily. http://www.sciencedaily.com­/releases/2008/06/080620133907.html.

36

van Deventer M. J. (2004). Measuring for sustainability: A multidi- mensional measurement framework for library and information services. LIBRI, 54(1), 1-8.

37

Venkatesh, V. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.

38

Wenger, E. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice:Harvard Business School Press.

39

Zeithaml, V. A. (1996). The behavioural consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31-46.

정보관리학회지