바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.25 No.3
Citation Share

Factor Analysis on Use Value of Academic Journals

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2008, v.25 no.3, pp.339-355
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.3.339



& (2008). Factor Analysis on Use Value of Academic Journals. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 25(3), 339-355, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.3.339
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The purpose of this empirical case study is to explore what factors affect on the economic valuation of academic journals and to ascertain the degree of each impact. For this study, factors were categorized into three groups: internal factors, external factors and demand theory factors. The on-line questionnaire was used to collect data and 383 responded from individual users of and the persons in charge of the DDS(Document Delivery Service). Collected data were analyzed using SPSS 12.0 for Windows/PC. The result showed that there exist a strong relationship between the internal factors of academic journals(i.e., Impact Factor, Cost, and Language) and economic valuation in terms of its use value.

keywords
학술지 가치 평가, 이용 가치, 지불 의사, 요인 분석, Economic Valuation of Academic Journals, WTP, Willingness to Pay, Factor Analysis, Use Value, Economic Valuation of Academic Journals, WTP, Willingness to Pay, Factor Analysis, Use Value

Reference

1.

구소연. (1998). 조건부가치측정법에 의한 관광자원의 가치 추정.

2.

권미수. (2004). 정보서비스의 가치측정방법론 연구: 조건부가치측정법을 중심으로:한국전산원.

3.

권오상. (2007). 환경경제학:박영사.

4.

김광웅. (1990). 사회과학조사방법론:박영사.

5.

김신영. (2004). 대학도서관의 외국학술지 평가모형 개발을 평가지표 분석. 정보관리학회지, 21(2), 45-68.

6.

김준순. (1997). 비시장재 가치평가에 있어 음의 지불의사 가능성에 근거한 토빗모형적용. 산림경제연구, 5(2), 59-66.

7.

김희섭. (2005). 온라인 정보의 경제적 가치 평가 모델 개발 및 적용. 정보관리학회지, 22(2), 165-184.

8.

김홍균. (2000). 환경경제학: 이론과 실제:박영사.

9.

서태설. (2005). 과학기술 정보자원 입수 효율화를 위한 정책 및 평가모델 (-). KOSTI 2005. COEX 인터컨티넨탈호텔.

10.

오호성. (1997). 환경경제학:법문사.

11.

윤희윤. (2007). 장서관리론:태일사.

12.

이정인. (2005). 소양호 수질개선편익 가치측정: 양분선택형 조건부가치측정법을 사용하여.

13.

정영호. (2005). 사회적일자리(기업)의 가치평가 및 국민경제적 파급효과분석. 보건사회연구, 25(1), 73-99.

14.

한국과학기술정보연구원. (2007). 과학기술정보자원 개발 및 정보 공동 활용에 대한 경제성 분석연구:동 연구원.

15.

Barschall, Henry H.. (1986). The Cost of Phys- ics Journals. Physics Today, 39(12), 34-36.

16.

Cameron, T.A.. (1991). Interval Estimates of Non-market Resource Value from Re- ferendum Contingent Valuation Sur- veys. Land Economics, 67(4), 413-421.

17.

Elrod, Terry. (1992). An Empirical Comparison of Ratings- Based and Conjoint Models. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3), 368-377.

18.

Evans, G. Edward. (2007). Developing Library and Infor- mation Collections. 5th ed:Libraries Unlimited.

19.

Holt, Glen. (2002). Cost Benefit Analysis: A Summary of The Methodology. The Bottom Line: Man- aging Library Finances, 15(4), 154-158.

20.

Holt, Glen, Donald Elliott, and Amonia Moore. Placing a Value on Public Li- brary Services. http://www.slpl.lib.mo.us/libsrc/restoc.htm.

21.

Loomis, J.B.. (1994). Broadening the Concept and Measurement of Existence Values. Northeast Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 17, 23-29.

22.

Schläpfer, Felix. (2007). Contingent Valuation: A New Perspective. Ecological Eco- nomics, 64(4), 729-740.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy