바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073

자원공유를 위한 온톨로지기반 컬렉션 단위 기술 모형개발 연구

A Study on the Model of Collection-Level Description based on Ontology for Resources Sharing

정보관리학회지, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2008, v.25 no.3, pp.209-230
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.3.209
이혜원 (서울여자대학교)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

본 연구는 빠르게 발전되는 네트워크 환경을 고려한 분산된 자원 활용에 필요한 기반 연구이다. 앞으로의 자원공유에 대한 노력은 기술적인 문제가 아닌 의미적인 상호운용성이 강조되어야 한다. 이를 위해 본 연구에서는 자원공유를 위한 컬렉션 단위 기술(collection level description; 이하 CLD라고 함) 모형을 제안하였다. 먼저 컬렉션의 범위, 구축목적, 관련 행위자들을 기반으로 하여 컬렉션에 대한 정의를 설명하였으며, CLD의 중요성을 강조한 연구와 그와 관련된 표준들을 비교·분석하였다. 마지막으로는 기존의 CLD의 기능에서 보강되어야 할 관계 중심의 모형 구축을 시도하였으며, 이를 위해 온톨로지 개념을 사용하였다. 온톨로지기반 CLD 모형은 새로운 관계를 창출하기 위한 다양한 표현 기술들을 정의하였다. 기존 연구와는 달리 클래스와 속성을 구별하고, 속성 중에서도 클래스 자체에 대한 특성과 클래스들 간의 관계를 연결하는 속성으로 나누어서 제시하였다.

Abstract

This study is based on the practical use for distributed resources considering growing network rapidly. The focal point of this study will be argued on semantic interoperability for sharing of resources, not be emphasized the technical issues of network. The aim of this article is developing the model of Collection-Level Description(CLD) for sharing of resources. The present article consists of a definition of collection in relation to the scope, objectives, and agents of the collection and an analysis of researches about CLD strengths and standards. Lastly, it was intended to construct the model focused on relation which was needed to be strengthened the existing CLD's function, thus, this study attempted to use the concept of ontology. The model of CLD based on ontology suggested the description could represent new relations inferred between classes and properties. Distinguishing class and property, furthermore, this study suggested properties were separated the characteristic of class and the relation with classes.

참고문헌

1

송영희. (2005). 디지털시대의 장서관리:한국도서관협회.

2

윤정옥. (2006). 미국, 영국, 호주 및 캐나다 대학도서관의 발전전략의 분석. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 37(1), 55-82.

3

윤희윤. (2007). 장서관리론:태일사.

4

이성숙. (2005). 디지털도서관에서 분산자원 검색을 위한 장서 정보에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 39(2), 185-209.

5

Biodiversity Information Standards. Natural Collections Descriptions (NCD): A data standard for exchanging data describing natural history collections. http://www.tdwg.org/standards/.

6

Biodiversity Information Standards. Natural Collection Description Ontology: Mi- grating NCD from XML schema to OWL. http://wiki.tdwg.org/twiki/pub/NCD/NCDWorkShop/NCD_ontology.pdf.

7

Brenner, Michaela. (2006). Digital Collection Management through the Library Catalog. Information Technology and Libraries, 25(2), 65-77.

8

Calanag, M. L.. (2004). Linking Preservation Metadata and Collection Management Policies. Collection Building, 23(2), 56-63.

9

Dempsey, Lorcan. The Library Catal- ogue in the New Discovery Environ- ment: Some Thoughts. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue48/dempsey/.

10

Dublin Core Collection Description Working Group. Dublin Core Collection Description Application Profile. http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/collection-application-profile/.

11

Foulonneau, Muriel. (2005). Using collection descriptions to enhance an aggregation of harvested item-level metadata (32-41). Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries.

12

Heaney, Micheal. Analytical Model Col- lections and their Catalogues. http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/rslp/model/amcc-v31.pdf.

13

Kemp, Zarine. (2007). Interoperability for Geospatial Analy- sis: a Semantics and Ontology-based Approach (83-92). Proc. Eighteenth Aus- tralasian Database Conference(ADC 2007). CRPIT.

14

Lee, Sul H.. (2005). Collection Management and Strategic Access to Digital Resources: the New Challenges for Research Libraries:Haworth Information Press.

15

LeFurgy, William G.. “Levels of Service for Digital Repositories.” D-Lib Magazine. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may02/lefurgy/05lefurgy.html.

16

Lourdi, I.. (2006). Metadata Policies for the Description of Digital Folklore Collections (-). Third International Conference of Museology & Annual Conference of AVICOM.

17

Macgregor, George. (2003). Collection-level de- scriptions: metadata of the future?. Library Review, 52(6), 247-250.

18

Powell, A.. RSLP Collection Descrip- tion; Collection Description Schema. htttp://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/rslp/schema/.

19

Powell, H.. Collection Description. D-Lib Magazine. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september00/powell/09powell.html.

20

Van Veen, T.. (2002). Metadata in the Context of The European Library Project (19-26). Proc. Int. Conf. on Dublin Core and Metadata for e-Communities.

21

Qin, J.. (2002). Ontological representation for learning objects (-). Proceedings of the Workshop on Documents Search Interface Design and Intelligent Access in Large-Scale Collections, JCDL'02.

22

Xin, Wang. (2004). Research and Usage of Collection Level Metadata in Chinese Digital Libraries. The International Information & Library Review, 36(4), 291-295.

정보관리학회지