바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.25 No.2
Citation Share

Content-based Image Retrieval Using Data Fusion Strategy

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2008, v.25 no.2, pp.49-68
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.2.049





& (2008). Content-based Image Retrieval Using Data Fusion Strategy. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 25(2), 49-68, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.2.049
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

In many information retrieval experiments, the data fusion techniques have been used to achieve higher effectiveness in comparison to the single evidence-based retrieval. However, there had not been many image retrieval studies using the data fusion techniques especially in combining retrieval results based on multiple retrieval methods. In this paper, we describe how the image retrieval effectiveness can be improved by combining two sets of the retrieval results using the Sobel operator-based edge detection and the Self Organizing Map(SOM) algorithms. We used the clip art images from a commercial collection to develop a test data set. The main advantage of using this type of the data set was the clear cut relevance judgment, which did not require any human interven- tion.

keywords
내용기반 이미지 검색, 데이터 융합, 소벨 윤곽선 검출, 자기조직화 지도, 클립아트 이미지, content-based image retrieval, data fusion, Sobel edge detection algorithm, Self-Organizing Map(SOM) algorithm, clip art images

Reference

1.

Amato, A.. (2003). Edge Detection Techniques in Image Retrieval: The Seman- tic Meaning of Edge (143-148). Proceedings of 4th EURASIP Conference focused on Video/ Image Processing and Multimedia Commu- nication.

2.

Aslam, J.A.. (2001). Models for metasearch (276-284). Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Develo- pement in Information Retrieval.

3.

Aslandogan, Y.A.. (2000). Multiple evidence combination in image retrieval: Diogenes searches for people on the Web (88-95). Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Internatio- nal ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval.

4.

Belkin, N.J.. (1994). Combining evidence for infor- mation retrieval (35-44). Proceedings of the Second Text Retrieval Conference.

5.

Chesnut, Casey. Self Organizing Map AI for Pictures. http://generation5.org/content/2004/aisompic.asp.

6.

Fox, E.A.. (1994). Combination of multiple searches (243-252). Proceedings of the Se- cond Text Retrieval Conference.

7.

Green, B.. Edge Detection Tutorial. http://www.pages.drexel.edu/~weg22/edge.html.

8.

Gonzalez, R.. (2002). Digital Image Processing. (2nd ed.):Prentice Hall.

9.

Hsu, D.F.. (2005). Comparing Rank and Score Combination Methods for Data Fusion in Information Retrieval. Information Retrieval, 8, 449-480.

10.

Kohonen, K.. (2001). Self-Organizing Maps. (3rd ed.):Springer.

11.

Lee, J.H.. (1997). Analyses of multiple evidence combination (267-276). Proceedings of the 20th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval.

12.

Manning, C.D.. (2008). Introduction to Information Retrieval:Cambridge University Press.

13.

Mase, H.. (2005). Proposal of two-stage patent retrieval method considering the claim structure. ACM Transactions on Asian Language Information Processing, 4(2), 190-206.

14.

Nova Development Corp. (2004). Nova Art Explosion 800,000 Clip Art:Calabasas.

15.

Paik, W.. (2007). An Evaluative Study on the Content-based Trademark Image Retrieval System Based on Self Organizing Map (SOM) Algorithm. Journal of Korea Society for Information Management, 24(3), 321-341.

16.

Rui, Y.. (1998). Re- levance feedback techniques in interactive content-based image retrieval:Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases.

17.

Rui, Y.. (1999). A novel relevance feedback technique in image retrieval (67-70). Pro- ceedings of the Seventh ACM international conference on Multimedia.

18.

Saracevic, T.. (1988). A study of information seeking and retrieving. III Searchers, searches, overlap. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 39, 197-216.

19.

Sjoberg, M.. (2007). PicSOM experiments in TRECVID 2006 (-). Online Proceedings of the TREC Video Retrieval Evaluation 2006.

20.

Vesanto, J.. (2000). Clustering of The Self-Organizing Map. IEEE Tran- saction on Neural Networks, 11(3), 586-600.

21.

Vogt, C.C.. (1999). Fusion via a linear combination of scores. Information Retrieval, 1(3), 151-173.

22.

Yavlinsky, A.. (2004). A comparative study of evidence combination strategies (1040-1043). Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy