바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Automatic Recommendation of Panel Pool Using a Probabilistic Ontology and Researcher Networks

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2007, v.24 no.3, pp.43-65
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2007.24.3.043





  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Automatic Recommendation System of Panel pool should be designed to support universal, expertness, fairness, and reasonableness in the process of review of proposals. In this research, we apply the theory of probabilistic ontology to measure relatedness between terms in the classification of academic domain, enlarge the number of review candidates , and rank recommendable reviewers according to their expertness. In addition, we construct a researcher network connecting among researchers according to their various relationships like mentor, coauthor, and cooperative research. We use the researcher network to exclude inappropriate reviewers and support fairness of reviewer recommendation process. Our methodology recommending proper reviewers is verified from experts in the field of proposal examination. It propose the proper method for developing a resonable reviewer recommendation system.

keywords
온톨로지, 연구자 네트워크, 심사자 추천시스템, 확률적 온톨로지, 과제관리시스템, Ontology, Probabilistic ontology, Researcher Networks, Panel pool, Reviewer

Reference

1.

김태수. (2000). 분류의 이해. , -.

2.

이재윤. (2006). 온톨로지 기반 과제관리 및 분석체제 구축 방안 연구. , -.

3.

한국대학교육협의회. (2006). 대학종합평가인정제 시행을 위한 대학종합평가 편람. , -.

4.

Barabasi, A. L. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. 311, 590-614.

5.

Costa, P. (2006). PR-OWL: A framework for probabilistic ontologies. , -.

6.

Costa, P. (2006). Probabilistic ontologies for efficient resource sharing in semantic web services. , -.

7.

Chung, Y. M. (2001). A corpus-based approach to comparative evaluation of statistical term association measures. 52(4), 283-296.

8.

Newman, M. E .J.. (2001a). Scientific collaboration networks: I. Network construction and fundamental results. (016131), -.

9.

Newman, M. E. J. (2001b). Scientific collaboration networks: II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. (016132), -.

10.

(2003). The structure and function of complex networks. 45(2), 167-256.

11.

(1998). How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution. 4, 131-134.

12.

(2000). Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. , -.

13.

(1992). The skewness of science Journal of the American Society for Information Science. , 628-638.

14.

(2004). Does citation reflect social structure? Longitudinal evidence from the Globenet interdisciplinary research group. 55(2), 111-126.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management