바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073

학술지 인용과 웹 링크 분석을 통한 과학기술분야의 학제성 비교 연구

A Comparative Study on Interdisciplinarity in the Fields of Science and Technology Based on Journal Citation and Web Link Analyses

정보관리학회지, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2007, v.24 no.3, pp.179-200
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2007.24.3.179
정호연 (연세대학교)
정영미 (연세대학교)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

이 논문에서는 학술지 인용 데이터와 웹 링크 데이터를 이용하여 8개 과학기술 분야의 학제적 구조를 파악하고 각 학문분야 간 학제성을 비교하였다. 분석 대상이 되는 학술지와 웹 페이지의 주제적 성격을 파악하기 위해 기존의 과학기술 분류체계를 재구성하여 이용하였다. 이 연구에서 학제성은 여러 학문분야 간 학제적 연결의 측면에서 파악하였으며, 학제성의 정도는 연관 학문분야의 수로 측정한 학제적 다양성과 자기인용률에 의해 평가하였다. 분석 결과 학술지 인용 분석에서는 밝혀내지 못한 새로운 학제적 연결을 웹 링크 분석에 의해 파악하였으며, 이를 통해 웹 링크 분석이 학제성을 연구하는 수단으로서 유용함을 알 수 있었다. 또한 인용 분석과 링크 분석에서 모두 자연과학 분야에 비해 공학 분야의 학제성이 대체로 더 높게 나타났다.

Abstract

This study identifies the interdisciplinary structures of 8 scientific disciplines in science and technology using the data from journal citations and web links, and compares the interdisciplinarity among these scientific disciplines. The interdisciplinarity refers to interdisciplinary connections among scientific fields and the degree of interdisciplinarity is measured by the number of associated fields and the rate of self-citation. A re-arranged classification scheme for science and technology was adopted to identify subject categories of journals and web pages. Web link analysis revealed a few additional interdisciplinary connections that were not identified by the journal citation analysis, thus demonstrating that it is useful means of investigating the interdisciplinarity of scientific fields. Besides, in most of the cases the interdisciplinarity of the engineering fields were found greater than that of the fields in natural sciences in both analyses.

참고문헌

1

(2005). 정보검색연구. , -.

2

(1999). Measuring interdisciplinary collaboration within a university: The effects of the multidisciplinary research programme. 46, 383-398.

3

(2004). Why do Academic Scientists Engage in Interdisciplinary Research?. , -.

4

(2006). The import and export of Cognitive Science. 30, 983-993.

5

Migration patterns of U.S. Ph.D.s among disciplines and specialties. , 145-164.

6

(1998). Advancing Interdisciplinary Studies. , 3-22.

7

(2001). An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators. 51(1), 203-222.

8

(2003). Interdisciplinarity in Science: A Tentative Typology Disciplines and Research Areas. 54(13), 1237-1249.

9

An indicator of cross-disciplinary research. , 161-176.

10

(1997). Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences. 48, 893-916.

11

(2001). Influence of interdisciplinarity on peer-review and bibliometric evaluations in physics research. 30, 357-361.

12

(2002). Impact measures of interdisciplinary research in physics. 53(2), 241-248.

13

(2004). Study of interdisciplinarity in chemistry research based on the production of Puerto Rican scientists 1992-2001. 9(4), -.

14

(2001). Interdisciplinarity as a multidimensional concept: Its measure in three different research areas. 10, 47-58.

15

G. 1994. Interdisciplinary Co-operation of Research Teams in Science Intensive Aareas of Technology. Final Report to the Commission of the European Union Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research Germany. Quoted in Carayole Why do Academic Scientists Engage in Interdisciplinary Research Working Papers of BETA. , -.

16

(2001). Mapping interdisciplinary reaserch fronts in neuroscience: A bibliometric view to retrograde amnesia. 51(1), 311-318.

17

(2004). Visualizing Interdisciplinary Citations to and from Information and Library Science Publications. , -.

18

(1996). Comparaive indicators of interdisciplinary in modern science. 18, 309-319.

19

(h.1990.). Information flows among academic disciplines in Japan. , 309-319.

정보관리학회지