바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Interactive Information Retrieval (IR) Models: Tradition and Development

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2007, v.24 no.2, pp.45-69
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2007.24.2.045

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This paper is divided into two parts. The first part elaborates on four Information Retrieval (IR) models: a traditional IR model and three more recent, user-oriented models of IR interaction presented by Belkin, Ingwersen, and Saracevic. The strengths and limitations of each model are discussed. The second part, based on an analysis of the previous models, presents the author's interactive model, namely, the Iceberg Model. The rationales that are given to explain the design of this model are associated with the following: a greater specificity of system attributes; more concrete interplays among different components of IR interaction; and, the increased role of the Human Information Intermediary (HII). In sum, the new model presents a framework that can evolve in varying information-seeking contexts.

keywords
Information Retrieval Model, Interactive Information Retrieval Model, Information Search, Information-seeking Behavior, User Study, Information Retrieval, Information Intermediary, 정보검색모형, 쌍방향 정보검색 모형, 인터액티브 정보검색모형, 정보탐색, 정보추구행태, 이용자연구, 정보검색, 정보매개자, Information Retrieval Model, Interactive Information Retrieval Model, Information Search, Information-seeking Behavior, User Study, Information Retrieval, Information Intermediary

Reference

1.

M. J. 1989"The Design of Browsing and Berrypicking Techniques for the Online Search Interface" Online Review. , 407-424.

2.

An exploratory study" Journal of the American Society for Information Science. , 149-159.

3.

N. J. 1980"Anomalous states of knowledge as the basis for information retrieval" Canadian Journal of Information Science. , 133-143.

4.

N. J. 1993"Interaction with texts Information retrieval as information-seeking behavior" Information Retrieval 55-66. Von der Modelierung zur Anwerdung. Konstanz. , -.

5.

(1995). Cases, scripts, and information seeking strategies: On the design of interactive information retrieval systems. 9(3), 379-395.

6.

(2000a). Evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. , -.

7.

(2000b). Experimental Components for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. 56(1), 71-90.

8.

(1997). The development of a method for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. 53(3), 225-250.

9.

A new approach to the design of document retrieval systems" Journal of the American Society for Information Science Moving toward a Reconceptualization" In B Dervin & M. Voigt Progress in Communication Sciences. , 389 73-112.

10.

B. 1983. An overview of sense making research and results to date. Seattle School of Communication University of Washington.. , -.

11.

M. 1986"Information needs and uses" In M. Williams Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. , 3-33.

12.

The Big Six Skills Approach to Library and Information Skills Instruction. Ablex Publishing Corporation. , -.

13.

(1997). The role of relational structures in indexing for the humanities. 24(2), 72-83.

14.

(1996). Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction : Elements of a cognitive IR theory. 52(1), 3-50.

15.

(2001a). Users in context. , 157-178.

16.

(2001b). Cognitive Information Retrieval. 34, 3-52.

17.

(2002). Cognitive perspectives of document representation. , 285-300.

18.

(2003a). Typology of ambiguity on representation of information problem: An exploratory study. , 366-380.

19.

(2003b). User-oriented representation of documents for Interactive IR: Connecting beyond-topical criteria of user-defined relevance with the surrogate features of an IR database. , -.

20.

Kuhlthau. C. C. 1988a"Developing a Model of the Library Search Process Investigation of Cognitive and Affective Aspects" Reference Quarterly. , 232-242.

21.

Kuhlthau. C. C. 1988b"Longitudinal Case Studies of the Information Search Process of Users in Libraries" Library and Information Science. , 251-304.

22.

Larsen, B. (2002). Exploiting citation overlaps for Information Retrieval : generating a boomerang effect from the network of scientific papers. 54(2), 155-178.

23.

Leckie, G. L. (1996). Modeling the information seeking of professionals: A general model derived from research on engineers, health care professionals and lawyers. 66, 161-193.

24.

Oddy. R. N. 1977"Information retrieval through man-machine dialogue" Journal of Documentation. , 1-14.

25.

T. K. 1993"The Nature of Relevance in Information Retrieval. , 318-351.

26.

T. K. 1994"Toward a Theory of User-Based Relevance A Call for a New Paradigm of Inquiry" Journal of the American Society for Information Science. , 135-141.

27.

(1996). Modeling interaction in information retrieval (IR) A review and proposal. 33, 3-9.

28.

(1997). The stratified model of information retrieval interaction : Extension and applications. 34, 313-327.

29.

(1999). Information science. 50(12), 1051-1063.

30.

M. S. 1990"A re-examination of relevance. , 755-776.

31.

(1997). Study of Interactive Feedback during Mediated Information Retrieval. 48(5), 382-394.

32.

R. S. 1968"Questions-negotiation and information seeking in libraries" College and Research Libraries. , 178-194.

33.

(2000). Users’ interaction with World Wide Web resources: An exploratory study using a holistic approach. 36(2), 229-251.

34.

(1998). A cognitive model of document use during a research project : Study 1. Document selection. 49(2), 115-133.

35.

T. D. 1981"On user studies and information needs" Journal of Documentation. , 3-15.

36.

(1999). Models in information behavior research. 55(3), 249-270.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management