바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.24 No.1
Citation Share

A Study on the Performance of Structured Document Retrieval Using Node Information

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2007, v.24 no.1, pp.103-120
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2007.24.1.103

(2007). A Study on the Performance of Structured Document Retrieval Using Node Information. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 24(1), 103-120, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2007.24.1.103
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Due to the radical changes of information technology, it becomes indispensable for educators and students of university to learn how to use copyrighted works ethically and legally without violating the copyright law. As a result, academic libraries need to take responsibilities to inform them fair use criteria and to provide proper fair use guidelines. This study analysed various fair use guidelines for them and copyright law to identify key areas of fair use guideline for the academic libraries. It also investigated 10 university libraries' web sites to find that the identified key areas are delivered to the educators and students.

keywords
fair use, university libraries, guidelines, copyright, 정보 공정사용, 저작권법, 대학도서관, 지침

Reference

1.

Abolhassani, M. (2004). Applying the Divergence from Randomness Approach for Content-Only Search in XML Documents. , -.

2.

Billingsley. (1979). Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics. , -.

3.

Callan. (1994). Passage-Level Evidence in Document Retrieval Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. , -.

4.

Carmel, D. (2003). Searching XML documents via XML fragments. , 151-158.

5.

Chiaramella, Y. (1996). A Model for multimedia information retrieval. 8314, -.

6.

Fuhr, N. (1998). DOLORES: A System for Logic-Based Retrieval of Multimedia Objects. , 257-265.

7.

Hatano, K. (2002). Determining the Unit of Retrieval Results for XML Documents. , -.

8.

Huang, F. (2006). Robert Gordon University at INEX 2006: Adhoc Track. , -.

9.

INEX(Initiative for the Evaluation of XML retrieval). http://inex.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de/. , -.

10.

(2006). INEX(Initiative for the Evaluation of XML retrieval). http://inex.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de/2006/. , -.

11.

Kamps, J. (2004). Length normalization in XML retrieval. , -.

12.

Kamps, J. (2003). XML Retrieval: What to Retrieve?. , -.

13.

Kaszkiel, M. (1997). Passage retrieval revisited. , 178-185.

14.

Kazai, G. (2002). Focused Structured Document Retrieval. , 241-247.

15.

Korfhage, R.. (1997). Information storage and retrieval. , -.

16.

Luk, Robert W.P. (2002). A survey in indexing and searching XML documents. 53(6), 415-437.

17.

Mass, Y. (2002). JuruXML - an XML retrieval system at INEX'02. , -.

18.

Mass, Y. (2003). Retrieving the most relevant XML Components. , -.

19.

Salton. (1993). Approach to passage retrieval in full text information systems Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. , -.

20.

Wilkinson. (1994). Effective retrieval of structured documents Proceedings of SIGIR Conference. , 311-317.

21.

Wolff, J.E. (2000). Searching and browsing collections of structural information. , -.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy