바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073

공통기술표현포맷에 기반한 다매체자료의 검색효율 향상에 관한 연구

Enhancing Expressiveness of Conceptual Modeling for Bibliographic Relationships - A Reflection on the FRBR Entity-Relationship Model -

정보관리학회지, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2006, v.23 no.4, pp.5-15
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2006.23.4.005
최윤선 (University of Illinois)
알렌리니어 (University of Illinois)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

서지관계모형을 위한 개념적 모델인 IFLA의 FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records)에 대한 대안적인 접근이 발표되어 왔지만, FRBR 모델의 내부적인 일관성에 대해서는 많은 연구가 진행되어 있지 않은 실정이다. 본 연구는 FRBR 객체-관계 (entity-relationship) 모델에서 객체들 (entities)간의 관계 (relationships) 에서 발생하는 상속 (inheritance) 속성과 관련된 모델의 내부적 모순점을 지적하며, 이러한 문제를 해결하기위해 FRBR 모델의 표현성 (expressiveness)을 강화하기 위한 여러 대안적인 방안을 논의한다.

Abstract

The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) is a “conceptual model of the bibliographic universe” developed by the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). Although some studies have suggested improvements in FRBR, and others explore alternative approaches, less attention has been paid to analyzing the internal coherence and consistency of the FRBR view as presented not only in the FRBR entity-relationship model and text of the FRBR document, but also in the related explanations and presentations of FRBR expositors. Our investigations have noted some interesting discrepancies between the general FRBR approach as presented in various expository documents and the specific account presented in the FRBR ER model and the FRBR document. We see that in one case these discrepancies can be easily remedied by adding additional modeling constructs and assertions, but in another case (the supposed “inheritance” of attributes across the Group 1 entities), there is a substantial difficulty in maintaining a consistent model. We discuss several alternative approaches to enhancing the expressiveness of FRBR in order remedy this problem. We note that none is entirely satisfactory.

참고문헌

1

(2003). Conceptual Modeling with Description Logics. , -.

2

(2004). FRBR and the Bibliographic Universe, or How to Read FRBR as a Model. , -.

3

(1998). IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records.. , -.

4

Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR. RDA. , -.

5

(2003). Re: Presention. manza(s), -.

6

(2003). Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records What is FRBR and why is it important? Presented at Canadian Metadata Forum. , -.

7

a powerful and ubiquitous abstraction pattern. Proceedings of the 20th VLPB Conference Santiago. , -.

8

(2005). Some conceptual modeling problems in FRBR. ICKM conference 2005. Proceedings of the International Conference of Knowledge Management.. , -.

9

(2006). Modeling our Understanding, Understanding Our Models: The Case of Inheritance in FRBR. , -.

10

(2001). The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization. Cambridge. , -.

11

(2002). A conceptual model giving primacy to expression-level bibliographic entity in cataloging. 58(4), 363-382.

12

(2002). The FRBR Model (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records). Workshop on Authority Control among Chinese, Korean and Japanese Languages (CJK Authority 3) March 14 18, 2002. , -.

13

(2003). The FRBR Model (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) ALCTS Institute on Metadata and AACR2. , -.

14

(1997.). Bibliographic Relationships. International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR. , -.

15

(1997.). Bibliographic Relationships. International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR. Toronto. , -25.

정보관리학회지