바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073

연구성과 측정을 위한 h-지수의 개량에 관한 연구

Some Improvements on H-Index : Measuring Research Outputs by Citations

정보관리학회지, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2006, v.23 no.3, pp.167-186
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2006.23.3.167
이재윤 (명지대학교)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

Hirsch(2005)가 제안한 h-지수는 인용을 통해서 개인의 연구 성과를 측정하려는 시도이다. h-지수는 용이한 산출 방법과 함께 지수의 강건성 등이 인정되면서 발표 이후 다양한 분야에서 이를 적용하거나 보완하는 연구가 활발히 이루어지고 있다. 이 연구에서는 우선 h-지수와 이를 보완한 g-지수를 비롯한 변형 지수에 대해서 현재까지 전개되고 있는 논의를 살펴보았다. 그리고 h-지수와 g-지수의 단점을 보완할 수 있는 개량 지수를 몇 가지 제안하고 가상 자료와 실제 자료에 대해서 측정해보았다. 측정 결과 제안한 지수들이 h-지수와 g-지수를 대체할 가능성이 있음을 확인하였다.

Abstract

The h-index, also called as Hirsch-index, is a new tool for measuring research outputs by citations. This h-index is not only easy to calculate, but also robust enough to handle various citation data. After its suggestion by Hirsch in 2005, many researchers applied the h-index to their own areas, and some others tried to improve the weak points of the h-index such as low discriminating power. Firstly, several of these efforts are reviewed in the present article, and then novel indexes are suggested to measure research outputs by citations more fairly and reasonably. Calculating these indexes on both artificial data and real data showed that the newly suggested indexes in this article can replace the h-index and its variants.

참고문헌

1

(2004). 03년도 SCI 과학기술논문 분석 내용. , -.

2

(2005). 학술지 영향계수와 연구업적 평가비중의 상관성 분석.. 36(3), 1-25.

3

(2002). Citation analysis: The counting house. 415, 726-729.

4

(2005). Index aims for fair ranking of scientists.. , 900-.

5

(2006). An extension of the Hirsch index indexing scientific topics and compounds. Submitted to Scientometrics. <http. , -.

6

(2002). The New Science of Networks. Perseus Books Group.. , -.

7

(2006). H-index for Price medalists revisited.. 2(1), 3-5.

8

(2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research valid across discipline. Submitted to Scientometrics. <http. , -.

9

(2005). Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? Scientometrics. 65(3), 391-392.

10

(2005). A Hirsch-type index for journals.. 19(22), 8-.

11

(2006). Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(9), 1275-1278.

12

(2006a). An improvement of the H-index: the G-index. 2(1), 8-9.

13

(2006b). Theory and practise of the g-index. To be published in Scientometrics.. , -.

14

(2006). On the h-index a mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact. Scientometrics. 67(2), 315-321.

15

(2005). H-index for Price medalists. ISSI Newsletter. 1(4), 15-18.

16

(2005). An index to quantify an individual's scfientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. , 16569-16572.

17

(2006). H-number. , -.

18

(2002). Euro-FactorTM : The New European Scientific Currency. , -.

19

(2006). Measures and mismeasures of scientific quality. , -.

20

Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation.. , -.

21

(1998). How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution. The European Physical Journal B. 4, 131-134.

22

(2006a). A case study : evolution of JASIS' Hirsch index. , 00005430-.

23

(2006b). New developments related to the Hirsch index. [online]. [cited 2006.6.28]. <http. , 00006376-.

정보관리학회지