바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.22 No.4
Citation Share

A Comparative Study on Modelling Readability Formulas: Focus on Primary and Secondary Textbooks

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2005, v.22 no.4, pp.173-195
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2005.22.4.173

(2005). A Comparative Study on Modelling Readability Formulas: Focus on Primary and Secondary Textbooks. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 22(4), 173-195, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2005.22.4.173
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to clarify whether readability formulas based on linguistic factors are suitable for secondary and older primary age texts. A comparison among fomulas for primary age texts, some for both primary and secondary age, and some for secondary age revealed that exclusive ones for narrow age range were more effective. A model estimating readability scores from the average number of sentences in paragraphs or a model with two factors, the average number of sentences and paragraphs in texts was found to be good one for secondary age. While a model based on total number of unique syllables or a model from total number of unique syllables and new syllable occurrence ratio was good for primary age.

keywords
텍스트수준, 텍스트수준 공식, 독서교육시스템, 교과서, readability, readability formula, reading instruction system, textbook

Reference

1.

글의 이독성에 영향을 미치는 요인과 이독성 측정의 모형화에 관한 연구. , -.

2.

(2003.). 웹 기반의 학교도서관 독서교육 시스템 설계에 관한 연구.. , 13-25.

3.

문장가독성 측정공식과 이를 통해 본 현대 국어 매스컴 문장의 가독성 측정조사. , -.

4.

이흥수. 1985. 문장의 이독성에 대한 측정 모형.. , 321-337.

5.

(2001.). 독서의 이해. , -.

6.

(1999.). 고등학교 생물 I II 교과서의 이독성 측정 도구로서의 Cloze 검사의 타당성 연구. , -.

7.

차배근. 1988. 국문 이독성 측정 방법 개발을 위한 서설적 소고. 서울대신문연구소학보. , 113-132.

8.

(2005.). 독서교육시스템을 위한 텍스트수준 측정 공식구성에 관한 연구.. , 213-232.

9.

(1995.). 신문 경제기사의 독이성에 관한 연구. , -.

10.

(2003.). 영유아;아동연구에서의 SPSS 자료분석. , -.

11.

and J. S. Chall. 1948. “A Formula for Predicting Readability.” Educa- tional Research Bulletin. , 11 28-20.

12.

Journal of Applied Psy- chology. , 111-113.

13.

Validity and Exten- sion to Level 17. Journal of Reading. , 242-252.

14.

R. 1952. The Technique of Clear Writing. New York. , -.

15.

C. 1980. Readability in the Class- room. Cambridge Educational.. , -.

16.

International Readability Association. 1985. “NCTE Take Stand on Readability Formulae.. , 1-.

17.

In Pearson P. D. ed. 1984. Handbook of Reading Research. New York 글의 이독성에 영향을 미치는 요인과 이독성 측정의 모형화에 관한 연구. longma(재인용), -.

18.

Journal of Reading. , 639-646.

19.

(1999.). “Effective Literacy Pro- grams.". , 9-11.

20.

and B. E. Kearl. 1957. “A Recalculation of 4 Readability Formulae. Journal of Edu- cational Psychology. , 99-105.

21.

(2005). Reading A to Z 홈페이지. [cited 2005.4]<http. , -.

22.

G. 1953. “A New Readability For- mula for Primary Grade Reading Ma- terials.. , 410-413.

23.

Development and Evaluation of a Job-Functional Literacy Trai- ning Program for the US Army.. , 339-369.

24.

E. L. 1921. A Teacher's Word Book of 10. , -.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy