바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Analysis of Evaluation Indicators for the Development of Evaluation Models of Foreign Academic Journals

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2004, v.21 no.2, pp.45-67
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2004.21.2.045


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The purposes of this study are to compare and analyze the evaluation indicators for selection of journal suggested by scholars and organizations and to prepare theoretical background for the ideal model to meet opposing paradigms of collection management in academic libraries. A web survey method was employed to investigate applications of various selection criteria (27 for printed and 37 for electronic academic Journal) from the top 40 academic libraries in Korea. In addition, data were analysed statistically using factor analysis, t-test, Analysis of Variance(ANOVA), and Spearman's Rank Oder Correlation. The mean ranking for 9 evaluation indicators for printed were as follows: subscribing volumes per departments, degree of use, selection authority, electronic/print bundle, ISI impact factor, Internationality and reputation, costs for subscription, ILL & DDS, space considerations for printed materials. But, 11 evaluation indicators for electronic were as follows: costs for subscription, accessibility, electronic/print bundle, consortia, selection authority, access expandability, subscribing volumes per departments, scholarly features of the university, ISI impact factor, ILL & DDS, internationality and reputations.

keywords
대학도서관, 전자저널, 선정기준, 평가지표, 학술지academic journal, electronic journal, evaluation indicator, selection criteria, university library, 대학도서관, 전자저널, 선정기준, 평가지표, 학술지academic journal, electronic journal, evaluation indicator, selection criteria, university library

Reference

1.

(1998). 국내학술지 평가에 관한 실험적 연구. 5, 109-114.

2.

(2001). 사회과학 자료분석. , -.

3.

(2002). Ranking of Na- tions and Heightened Competition in Matthew Core Journal: Two Faces of the Matthew Effect for Countries. 50(3), 440-460.

4.

(2003). Serial Selection Policy. , -.

5.

(2001). Planning for the Balance between Print and Elec- tronic Journals in the Hybrid Di- gital Library: Lessons Learned from Large ARL Libraries. , -.

6.

(1991). a Survey of North American Academic Lib- raries. , 29-46.

7.

(2001). E-Journal Build- ing and Its Impact on Academic Libraries: Some Early Result. 30(Spring), -.

8.

(1998). Management of Serials in Libraries. , -.

9.

(2003). Fact Sheet Journal Selection for Index Medicus/MEDLINE. , -.

10.

(2003). Factors to Consider in Evaluating Journals. , -.

11.

(2003). Journal Selection Criteria for 2003. , -.

12.

(2002). Journal Evalu- ation: Technical and Practical Is- sues. 50(3), 418-439.

13.

(2003). Serial Policy, Selection Criteria. , -.

14.

(2000). Full-Text Database and the Journal Cancellation Pro- cess: a Case Study. 26(3), 19-31.

15.

(2003). De- tailed Journal Selection Criteria. , -.

16.

(2003). Collec- tion Development Policy State- ment: Electronic Publications. , -.

17.

(2003). Fac- tors to Consider in Evaluating Jour- nal. , -.

18.

(2003). Col- lection Development Policy: Gene- ral Serial Selection Guidelines. , -.

19.

(1996). Serials Acquisi- tion. 29(1/2), 153-161.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management