초록

본 연구에서는 R2RML 방식과 Non-R2RML 방식을 각각 적용하여 RDB를 RDF 온톨로지로 변환한 결과를 비교하였다. RDB 기반의 구조적학술용어사전 데이터베이스인 STNet의 데이터를 대상으로, 변환이 완료된 데이터의 규모, 튜플당 변환에 걸리는 시간, 그리고 질의 응답 속도를 측정하였다. 변환 규모의 평가 결과 Non-R2RML 방식이 더 많은 수의 변환을 하였으며, 표현의 풍부성과 추론 가능성 정도를 높이는 변환을 수행한 것으로 나타났다. 튜플당 변환 시간의 경우 Non-R2RML 방식이 미세하지만 더 빠른 것으로 나타났으며, 질의 응답 속도는 두 방식 모두 300회 이상의 질의 횟수부터는 안정적인 성능을 보이면서 유사한 형태의 속도를 보였다. 측정에 대한 종합적 검토 결과 데이터의 변형이 빈번하고 새로운 데이터의 추가나 데이터들 간의 연결관계가 지속적으로 변화하는 STNet과 같은 동적인 RDB에는 Non-R2RML 방식이 적절한 것으로 평가되었다.

Abstract

This study described the results of converting RDB to RDF ontology by each of R2RML method and Non-R2RML method. This study measured the size of the converted data, the conversion time per each tuple, and the response speed to queries. The STNet, a structured terminology dictionary based on RDB, was served as a test bed for converting to RDF ontology. As a result of the converted data size, Non-R2RML method appeared to be superior to R2RML method on the number of converted triples, including its expressive diversity. For the conversion time per each tuple, Non-R2RML was a little bit more faster than R2RML, but, for the response speed to queries, both methods showed similar response speed and stable performance since more than 300 numbers of queries. On comprehensive examination it is evaluated that Non-R2RML is the more appropriate to convert the dynamic RDB system, such as the STNet in which new data are steadily accumulated, data transformation very often occurred, and relationships between data continuously changed.

초록

This study proposes the analysis method in sentence semantics that can be automatically identified and processed as appropriate items in the system according to the composition of the sentences contained in the data corresponding to the logical semantic structure metadata of the research papers. In order to achieve the purpose, the structure of sentences corresponding to ‘Research Objectives’ and ‘Research Outcomes’ among the semantic structure metadata was analyzed based on the number of words, the link word types, the role of many-appeared words in sentences, and the end types of a word. As a result of this study, the number of words in the sentences was 38 in ‘Research Objectives’ and 212 in ‘Research Outcomes’. The link word types in ‘Research Objectives’ were occurred in the order such as Causality, Sequence, Equivalence, In-other-word/Summary relation, and the link word types in ‘Research Outcomes’ were appeared in the order such as Causality, Equivalence, Sequence, In-other-word/Summary relation. Analysis target words like ‘역할(Role)’, ‘요인(Factor)’ and ‘관계(Relation)’ played a similar role in both purpose and result part, but the role of ‘연구(Study)’ was little different. Finally, the verb endings in sentences were appeared many times such as ‘∼고자’, ‘∼였다’ in ‘Research Objectives’, and ‘∼었다’, ‘∼있다’, ‘∼였다’ in ‘Research Outcomes’. This study is significant as a fundamental research that can be utilized to automatically identify and input the metadata element reflecting the common logical semantics of research papers in order to support researchers’ scholarly sensemaking.

Abstract

초록

본 연구의 목적은 저자키워드의 출현빈도와 해당 키워드가 속한 논문들의 총피인용횟수 간 상관관계 여부를 확인하고자 하는 것이다. 연구의 배경은 인문사회과학 분야 학술용어사전을 구축하는데 있어서 실제 연구에서의 활용도가 높고 다른 키워드와의 의미적 연관관계가 많은 학술용어를 추출하기 위한 방법론을 개발해 보고자 하는 것이다. 본 연구의 목적을 이루기 위해 한국연구재단 한국학술지인용색인(KCI)에 수록된 2007년에서 2011년까지의 인문학 및 사회과학 분야 학술지 논문의 저자키워드와 피인용횟수를 분석하였다. 분석 결과 저자키워드의 출현빈도와 해당 키워드가 속한 논문들의 총피인용횟수는 통계적으로 상관관계가 있으며, 저자키워드의 출현빈도가 늘어날수록 논문의 총피인용횟수도 많아지는 것으로 나타났다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to verify the correlation between the appearance frequency of author keyword and the number of citation in journal articles. In this study, we were trying to develop a methodology that can select the term having semantic relation with other terms and higher utilization to build a structured scientific glossary. In order to achieve this purpose, we analyzed the number of citation and the author keyword of the humanities and social science journal articles of the Korea Citation Index (KCI) from 2007 to 2011. This study found a correlation between appearance frequency of author keyword and the number of citation of the journal articles, with higher appearance frequency of author keyword of the journal articles being more cited.