초록

Abstract

This study constructed an ontology targeting journal articles and evaluated its performance. Also, the performance of a triple structure ontology was compared with the knowledge base of an inverted index file designed for a simple keyword search engine. The coverage was three years of articles published in the Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management from 2007 to 2009. Protégé was used to construct an ontology, whilst utilizing an inverted index file to compare performance. The concept ontology was manually established, and the bibliography ontology was automatically constructed to produce an OWL concept ontology and an OWL bibliography ontology, respectively. This study compared the performance of the knowledge base of the ontology, using the Jena search engine with the performance of an inverted index file using the Lucene search engine. As a result, The Lucene showed higher precision rate, but Jena showed higher recall rate.

초록

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop a methodology of user participation evaluation of a scholarly information site in the field of science and technology and to enhance the site by applying a set of testing protocols. Experiments were conducted in a laboratory setting. Data from multiple sources, including eyetracking, search logs and post surveys, were collected and analyzed quantitatively. Based on the results of eyetracking, the contents and images were reorganized after removing unessential elements in the site. The resulting data from the search logs showed that the users were able to finish the tasks more quickly with the revised user interface. The results of the data analysis of post surveys indicated an overall improvement in the revised website compared to the original one.

초록

포털사이트는 검색엔진을 넘어 사이버스페이스 자체를 의미할 정도로 개념과 영역이 확대되었다. 일반인들뿐만 아니라, 필요로 하는 학술정보가 서비스되기 때문에 연구자도 포털사이트를 많이 이용한다. 그동안 포털의 검색은 얼마나 많은 정보를 검색하게 해 줄 것인가 하는 양적인 면에 관심을 두었다. 그러나 최근에는 검색의 질에 보다 관심이 많아지고 있다. 이 논문은 포털이 제공하는 학술정보검색의 문제점을 분석하고, 비교적 신뢰성을 인정받는 사전 서비스와 학술정보를 연계함으로써 학술정보검색의 질을 향상하기 위한 시범적인 시도이다. 즉, 검증되고 압축적으로 정리된 사전의 표제어와 해당 표제어를 키워드로 하는 권위 있는 연구 성과를 연계시킴으로써, 사전을 검색할 때 주제어 관련 연구 성과까지 검색할 수 있게 하는 방안을 제시하고자 한다.

Abstract

Internet portals have been revolutionized not only as simple search engines but also as a new space for the Internet users. They have developed to give satisfying search results for academic information users. academic fields. However, their attention was given to the quantity rather than the quality of the results. This tendency is now changing. This study addresses the problems in the search process using the current portal sites and presents an integrated scholarly information service where users can access more organized and trustworthy information linked with online technical keyword dictionary. When a user enter a keyword on a portal site, he/she can access to high quality scholarly information resources linked with keyword. This could assure the user to get an expanded knowledge with confirmation.

초록

본 연구는 국내 대학도서관 사서 326명을 대상으로 설문조사를 통하여 도서관 3.0 서비스에 대한 인지도 및 향후 유용성 정도, 대응전략 등에 대하여 알아보았다. 본 연구의 결과, 도서관 3.0 서비스에 대한 인지도는 ① 모바일 도서관, ② 시멘틱 검색, ③ 인공지능, ④ 클라우드 컴퓨팅, ⑤ 온톨로지, ⑥ 링키드 도서관의 순이었다. 도서관 3.0 서비스에 대한 유용성은 ① 모바일 도서관, ② 링키드 도서관, ③ 시멘틱 검색, ④ 클라우드 컴퓨팅, ⑤ 인공지능, ⑥ 온톨로지의 순이었다. 그리고 도서관 3.0 서비스에 대한 인지도가 도서관 경쟁력으로 작용하지 못하고 개인적인 경쟁력으로만 그치는 것으로 나타나 추후 개인의 경쟁력을 조직의 경쟁력으로 끌어올릴 수 있는 방안에 대한 연구가 필요하다.

Abstract

This study analyzed the level of 326 academic librarians awareness, usability and counter strategies on the Library 3.0. The results revealed the awareness level in the following order: that ① Mobile Library ② Semantic Search ③ AI(Artificial Intelligent) ④ Cloud Computing ⑤ Ontology ⑥ Linked Data. The order of the future usability for the Library 3.0 was ranked ① Mobile Library ② Linked Data ③ Semantic Search ④ Cloud Computing ⑤ AI and ⑥ Ontology. To conclude, the level of awareness and the usability of Library 3.0 were shown to be statistically significant. There are, however, some discrepancies in awareness differ across librarians and regions. Moreover, the level of awareness for the Library 3.0 did influence the library’s organizational performance but the individual librarian’s competences only.