초록

대학에서 연구가 중요한 활동으로 주목을 받게 되면서 대학도서관에서도 연구지원 역할이 강조되고 있다. 이 연구에서는 북미 및 국내 60개 대학의 디지털도서관 홈페이지에서 온라인상으로 연구지원 가이드를 제공하는 현황을 조사하여 13개의 주요 내용유형을 분석하였고 이를 기반으로 하여 대학도서관이 연구지원 가이드 내용을 구성하는데 고려해야 할 5개의 주요 영역을 제시하였다. 또한 연구지원 가이드가 온라인상으로 제공되는 방식과 가이드를 통해 사서와 이용자가 소통하는 방식을 분석하였다. 연구지원 가이드를 제작, 제공하는 주체는 사서이며 대학도서관의 사서 역할은 향후 정보를 제공하는 역할에서 이용자를 위한 정보를 생산하는 역할로 확장될 것으로 예측된다.

Abstract

Research has taken priority of many activities in universities and it has eventually brought the heat on research support services of libraries to meet high expectation of university researchers. To identify the major content areas and service methods of research guides serviced through digital libraries of universities, this study investigated research guides of 60 university libraries in North America and Korea. As a result, 13 categories for research guide contents were identified and 5 crucial areas for the contents development were suggested. It also analyzed providing methods of online research guides and communicating methods between librarians and users. Librarians were identified as the prime human resource to develope and manage research guides, which will play an important role in expanding diversity of librarians' roles in the future.

초록

Abstract

In this study, research topic areas in Korean and American medical schools were analyzed to detect each nation’s major research areas. CLINICAL NEUROLOGY was identified as the Korean researchers’ major subject area by the total number of journals and ‘RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING’ was the most major area by the total number of articles. On the other hand, American researchers’ top major subject area was the one same area according to all analysis, BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. In addition, Korean researchers showed publishing tendency related to journal preference in several subject areas.

초록

본 연구는 ‘한국연구재단 오픈액세스 2021(안)’에 대한 실행방안을 도출하기 위한 것이다. 본 연구는 APC 지원규모와 방법 및 절차, 국내 학술지의 오픈액세스 전환 지원, 오픈액세스 리포지터리에 논문을 기탁하는 방안 등 세 가지 측면에서 실행방안을 제안하였다. 첫째, APC는 합리적인 수준에서 지원되어야 하며 그 상한액을 설정하기 위하여 매년도 이전 3년간 오픈액세스 학술지에 출판한 논문의 APC 평균값이나 중위값을 적용한다. 또한 APC는 오픈액세스 학술지와 오픈액세스전환약정 학술지에 논문을 출판하는 경우 지원하고 하이브리드 학술지나 이중접근 학술지에는 지원하지 않는다. 둘째, 국내 학술지 오픈액세스 출판전환을 위하여 과도기에는 KJCI에 CCL 적용을 등록한 오픈액세스 학술지와 오픈액세스 출판 전환의향서를 제출한 학술지에 대하여 지원사업 신청이 가능하도록 해야 한다. 셋째, 하이브리드 학술지와 이중접근 학술지 및 구독학술지에 출판한 경우 원문기탁과 동시에 엠바고 등 저작권 사항을 보고해야 한다. 본 연구의 결과는 한국연구재단이 국내 학술지 출판환경과 국제적인 학술커뮤니케이션 상황에 부합하는 오픈액세스 정책을 신속하면서도 안정적이고 지속적으로 실행하는데 기초 자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

Abstract

This study aims to identify the methods of implementation for the ‘National Research Foundation of Korea Open Access 2021(Plan)’. This study covers the methods of implementation in the three following core items: 1) developing the details on the amount, method, and procedures of APC support; 2) proposing methods for facilitating the transition of domestic Korean academic journals to open access journals; and 3) developing methods of entrusting papers to open access repositories. APC support should be guaranteed at a reasonable level. The average or median of APC values for the previous three years will be applied to set the upper limit for support each year. APC support will be provided when the paper is published to open access journals or transitioning journals to open access. Hybrid journals or dual access journals are not included. Support for open access publishing of academic journals in Korea during the transition period will be available for open access journals that have registered for CCL in KJCI or journals that have submitted their application for transitioning to open access. Publishing in hybrid, dual access or subscription-based journals must be accompanied by items related to copyright such as embargo. Research results will be used for the detailed implementation plan of ‘NRF OA2021 (Plan)’. They will serve as the base data for the rapid, stable, and sustainable implementation of open access policy in NRF, addressing the Korean domestic academic journal publishing environment and the field of international academic communication.

초록

이 연구는 국내 기록관리표준의 연구동향을 분석한 것으로 이를 위해 기록관리표준 관련 논문의 표제-주제어-초록의 키워드를 추출하여 상위빈도 키워드의 분석과 키워드 네트워크 분석을 수행하였다. 분석 대상 기간은 2000년부터 현재까지이며 RISS와 ScienceON 등의 국내 학술논문 검색사이트에서 총 212편의 논문을 수집하여 연구를 수행하였다. 분석 결과 2000~2010년까지는 아카이브 설계를 위한 OAIS의 연구, OAIS를 통한 디지털 기록 보존연구 ISO 표준의 분석 연구 등이 주로 진행되었고, 2011년 이후부터 지금까지는 기록경영인증, ISAD(G)의 RiC 전환 등의 연구가 진행되었음을 알 수 있었다. 이 연구는 기록관리표준 연구의 국내 연구동향을 분석함으로써 연구 흐름을 파악하는 기초자료로 활용되며, 기존 기록관리표준을 연구할 때 참고자료로 역할을 할 것으로 기대한다.

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze and collect research trends of archival management standards in Korea. For this purpose, keywords from the titles, author keywords, and abstracts of papers related to records management standards were statistically analyzed to investigate the major keywords with high-frequency. Network analysis with high frequency keywords was also conducted to identify the subject areas of research in archival management standards. The analysis period is from 2000 to the present, and a total of 212 papers were collected from domestic academic paper search sites such as RISS and ScienceON. As a result of the analysis, from 2000 to 2010, OAIS for archive design, digital record preservation with OAIS, and analysis on ISO standards were mainly conducted in research areas. From 2011 until now, records management certification and ISAD(G)’s conversion to RiC emerged as new research areas. This study will be expected to be basic data to understand research trends in records management standards in Korea and to be a reference for research on records management standards studies.

초록

학술지의 인용빈도를 특정하여 산출된 지수로 단일 논문의 영향력을 평가하는 것에 대한 비판으로 인해 단일 논문의 인용 영향력을 측정하는 인용지수에 대한 연구가 다양하게 시도되었다. 이 연구에서는 8개의 단일 논문 인용영향력 평가 지수를 살펴보고 KCI 논문 데이터베이스를 대상으로 각 인용지수의 분야별 편향성을 조사하여 보았다. 대상 지수는 단순 인용빈도, 페이지랭크, f-값, CCI, c-지수, 단일문헌 h-지수, 단일문헌 hs-지수, cl-지수였다. 분석결과 페이지랭크가 학문 분야별 균등성, 학문 분야 내에서 학술지별 균등성 영역에서 가장 편향성이 없는 것으로 나타났다. 반면에 단순 인용빈도는 특정 학문분야나 특정 학술지에 편향된 결과를 산출할 가능성이 높은 것으로 나타났다. KCI 데이터베이스에서는 논문의 단순 인용빈도만 제공하고 있는데, 분야별 균등성을 가장 잘 유지하는 지수인 논문 페이지랭크를 함께 제공할 필요가 있다. 아울러 인용한 문헌의 인용빈도만으로 산출이 가능해서 이용자의 검색 결과로부터 바로 산출할 수 있는 지역 네크워크 지수 중에서는 cl-지수가 가장 균등성을 잘 유지하므로 계산 과정과 서비스가 손쉬운 지수로 함께 제공하는 것도 검토해야 한다.

Abstract

The impact of a journal is commonly used as the impact of an individual paper within that journal. It is problematic to interpret a journal’s impact as a single paper’s impact of the journal, so there are several researches to measure a single paper’s impact with its own citation counts. This study applied 8 impact indicators to Korean Citation Index database and examined discipline bias of each indicator. Analyzed indicators are simple citation counts, PageRank, f-value, CCI, c-index, single publication h-index, single publication hs-index, and cl-index. PageRank has the least discipline bias at highly ranked papers and journal bias in a discipline. On the contrary, simple citation counts showed strongly biased results toward a certain discipline or a journal. KCI database provides only simple citation counts. It needs to show PageRank (global indicator) to discover influential papers in diverse areas. Furthermore it needs to consider to provide the best of local indicators. Local indicators can be calculated only with papers in users’ search results because they uses citation counts of citing papers and the number of references. They are more efficient than global indicators which explore the whole database. KCI should also consider to provide Cl-index (local indicator).

초록

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify topic areas of academic library research using two informetric methods; word clustering and Pathfinder network. For the data analysis, 139 articles published in major library and information science journals from 2005 to 2009 were collected from the Korean Science Citation Index database. The keywords that represent research topics were gathered from two sections: an abstract and titles in references. Results showed that reference titles usefully represent topics in detail, and combining abstracts and reference titles can produce an expanded topic map.

초록

Abstract

Since information scientists have begun trying to quantify significant research trends in scientific publications, ‘-metrics’ research such as ‘bibliometrics’, ‘scientometrics’, ‘informetrics’, ‘webometrics’, and ‘citation analysis’ have been identified as crucial areas of information science. To illustrate the dynamic research activities in these areas, this study investigated the major contributors of ‘-metrics’ research for the last decade at three levels: nations, institutions, and documents. ‘-metrics’ literature of this study was obtained from the Science Citation Index for the years 2001-2011. In this analysis, we used Pathfinder network, PNNC algorithm, PageRank and several indicators based on h-index. In terms of international collaborations, USA and England were identified as major countries. At the institutional level, Katholieke University, Leuven and the University of Amsterdam in Europe and Indiana University and the Office of Naval Research in the USA have led co-research projects in informetrics areas. At the document level, Hirsch’s h-index paper and Ingwersen’s web impact factor paper were identified as the most influential work by two methods: PageRank and single paper h-index.

초록

Abstract

This study examined two characteristics of library and information science (LIS) journals in Korea through analysis of journal coupling with common authors. This study also illustrated the trend of Korean LIS research in the recent decade. The notable change is that record management and archival studies settle in LIS domain as a major research area. We introduced two indicators, Publishing Preference Index (PPI) and Researcher Attraction Index (RAI), based on the degree of common authors among journals. Both indicators revealed notable changes in author coupling, including reversal of PPIs in some journals, which can be interpreted as proof of changes in their author groups. The RAI analysis, which measured the degree of journals’ attractiveness to Korean LIS researchers and author sharing between two journals, illustrated the journals’ states in a domain; this result can help find both an isolated journal and strongly bonded journals in the specific domain. Journal coupling with common authors introduced in this study proved to be an effective investigative method for illustrating journals’ states in a specified domain as well as a multidisciplinary area.

초록

대학소속 연구자들의 연구 분야가 다변화되면서 대학도서관에서는 서비스 운영을 위하여 학과별 주제 분야를 파악하는 것이 중요한 과제로 인식되고 있다. 이 연구는 대학 학과 소속구성원들의 학술지 논문 서지사항을 분석하여 학과별 주제특성을 다차원적으로 분석하고자 하였다. 게재한 학술논문을 분석하여 1차적으로 해당 학과의 주제영역을 파악하고자 하였으며 심층적으로 주제영역을 분석하기 위하여 해당 논문들이 인용한 학술지를 조사하여 확장된 주제영역을 조사하였다. 또한 상위 인용된 학술지를 대상으로 네트워크 분석을 하여 학술지간 관계를 분석하였다. 분석 결과 학과별 주제 분야별 학술지 이용현황에 차이가 있는 것으로 조사되었으며 특정 주제 분야의 경우 학술지 종수와 논문 수에 따라 주제 분야의 중요도가 비례하지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 즉, 특정분야의 경우 소수의 학술지에서 많은 논문이 인용되고 있는 현상이 있으며 게재하는 주제 분야와 인용하는 주제 분야의 중요도가 일치하지 않는 것으로 나타났다.

Abstract

As topics of researchers become diverse horizontally or vertically, academic libraries have difficulties to identify the dynamic change of researchers' needs for academic publications. This research aims to illustrate the topic areas of researchers in a department of university by analyzing bibliographies of their publications. First, researchers' publications were used to discover the topic areas where the researchers had published. Second, the cited publications in those papers were analysed to identify the expanded topic areas of these researchers. Finally, highly cited journals were analyzed by network analysis method. The major finding is that the importance of topic areas by the number of journals was not necessarily proportional to that by the number of papers. Researchers have a tendency to use many papers in a small number of journals in a certain topic area. Furthermore, the importance of topic areas discovered by researchers' publications was not the same as that discovered by researchers' citations.

초록

Abstract

Since the 1990s, informetrics has grown in popularity among information scientists. Today it is a general discipline that comprises all kinds of metrics, including bibliometrics and scientometrics. To illustrate the dynamic progress of this field, this study aims to identify the structure and infrastructure of the informetrics literature using statistical and profiling methods. Informetrics literature was obtained from the Web of Knowledge for the years 2001-2010. The selected articles contain least one of these keywords: ‘informetrics’, ‘bibliometrics’, ‘scientometrics’, ‘webometrics’, and ‘citation analysis.’ Noteworthy publication patterns of major countries were identified by a statistical method. Intellectual structure analysis shows major research areas, authors, and journals.