초록

국내 학술회의 논문으로 구성된 문헌집합을 대상으로 기계학습에 기초한 자동분류의 성능에 영향을 미치는 요소들을 검토하였다. 특히 구현이 쉽고 컴퓨터 처리 속도가 빠른 로치오 알고리즘을 사용하여 『한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집』의 논문에 주제 범주를 자동 할당하는 분류 성능 측면에서 분류기 생성 방법, 학습집합 규모, 가중치부여 기법, 범주 할당 방법 등 주요 요소들의 특성을 다각적인 실험을 통해 살펴보았다. 결과적으로 분류 환경 및 문헌집합의 특성에 따라 파라미터(β, λ)와 학습집합의 크기(5년 이상)를 적절하게 적용하는 것이 효과적이며, 동등한 성능 수준이라면 보다 단순한 단일 가중치부여 기법을 사용하여 분류의 효율성을 높일 수 있음을 발견하였다. 또한 국내 학술회의 논문의 분류는 특정 논문에 하나 이상의 범주가 부여되는 복수-범주 분류(multi-label classification)가 실제 환경에 부합한다고 할 수 있으므로, 이러한 환경을 고려하여 주요 성능 요소들의 특성에 기초한 최적의 분류 모델을 개발할 필요가 있다.

Abstract

This study examined the factors affecting the performance of automatic classification for the domestic conference papers based on machine learning techniques. In particular, In view of the classification performance that assigning automatically the class labels to the papers in Proceedings of the Conference of Korean Society for Information Management using Rocchio algorithm, I investigated the characteristics of the key factors (classifier formation methods, training set size, weighting schemes, label assigning methods) through the diversified experiments. Consequently, It is more effective that apply proper parameters (β, λ) and training set size (more than 5 years) according to the classification environments and properties of the document set. and If the performance is equivalent, I discovered that the use of the more simple methods (single weighting schemes) is very efficient. Also, because the classification of domestic papers is corresponding with multi-label classification which assigning more than one label to an article, it is necessary to develop the optimum classification model based on the characteristics of the key factors in consideration of this environment.

초록

Abstract

Although it has been a long subject of study why researchers prefer some cited documents to others, the existing relative researches have had a variety of perspectives on the nature and complexity of the citation behavior and not provided a complete answer to this question. In particular, Korea researchers mainly used statistical analysis of bibliographic information, which has limitations in revealing dynamic and complex cognitive aspects of the citation process. In this study, I investigate the citer perception of citing motives and bibliographic factors through survey and compared the responses according to the researchers’ characteristics. After extracting the 22 motivations and 21 factors through the literature analysis and configuring a 5-point Likert scale questions, I conducted a survey in the wat of an e-mail attachment. From the SPSS 22.0, the frequency analysis, t-test, and one-way ANOVA were performed on the 354 valid samples. As a result, it is found that supporting is considered the most important citing motive and social connection, self-citation have little influence. In the case of bibliographic factors, the journal’s reputation was recognized the most influential factor and the number of pages and authors was the least. Significant differences in fields of study and research careers were showed in some parts. These results can substantiate earlier studies, determine whether the factors assumed influential in selecting references were intended, and suggest the search point to the specialty library or academic database.

초록

최근 특허기술의 가치평가가 크게 강조되고 있으며, 특허의 피인용횟수는 특허기술 가치평가에 있어 중요한 척도이다. 본 연구에서는 국내 특허를 대상으로 피인용횟수에 영향을 주는 변수들을 도출하기 위하여 일반화 선형모형 회귀분석을 실시하였다. 총 12개의 변수를 형태적, 기술적 그리고 개념적 요인으로 분류하였고, 국내 의료기기 특허 14개의 분야에 적용하여 분석한 결과 출원인 국적, 출원인 유형, 발명자 수, 출원국가 수, IPC 수, 참고문헌 수, 서지결합도가 특허 피인용횟수에 유의미한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 국내 실정에 적용 가능한 연구를 수행함으로써 국내 특허에 대한 인용 분석 방법론에 있어서 실질적인 기초적 자료를 제공했다는데 의의가 있다.

Abstract

The valuation of patented technology has been recently emphasized, and the patent citation is known as an important factor. This study performed a generalized linear model to find variables that effect the patent citation. We classified 13 variables as morphological, technological and conceptual factors and used them to find out effective variables in 14 medical devices classification. Through the empirical study, we found seven effective variables (assignee nationality, assignee character, the number of inventors, the number of application countries, the number of IPC, the number of references, the strength of bibliographic coupling). In order to apply to Korean industry, this study has significance that provides basic research to citation analysis model.