바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

검색어: informetrics, 검색결과: 17
1
강대신(한국과학기술연구원) ; 문성빈(연세대학교) 2009, Vol.26, No.3, pp.377-394 https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2009.26.3.377
초록보기
초록

본 연구는 기존의 연구성과 분석의 한계를 극복하고 영향력이나 파급효과 등 질적 중심의 연구성과 분석을 위해 텍스트 마이닝, 인용 분석 등을 활용한 새로운 계량정보학적 분석지표를 제안하였다. 즉, 논문품질지수, 인용 영향력지수, 지식확산지수, 국제협력연구지수, 우수논문 생산지수 등 새로운 연구성과 분석지표를 제안하여 질적인 측면을 중심으로 한 연구성과 분석이 가능하도록 하였다. 그리고 제안된 지표를 활용하여 사례분석을 수행하여 그 가능성을 확인하였다.

Abstract

There are some limitations in the existing bibliometric methods to satisfy the various requests of the interest parties including researchers, managers, policy makers to identify 1) which research group or researcher is the key player, and the overall trends of the particular technological sub-fields, 2) which research groups, institutions or countries mainly use their research outputs, 3) what are the spin-offs from research outputs to some scientific and technological fields, 4) in which levels they are when comparing their quantitative and qualitative research outputs to those of other competitive institutions. It is essential to develop new informetric indicators and methodologies in order to satisfy stakeholder's various demands and to strengthen qualitative analysis in measuring research performance. This study suggested informetric indicators such as article quality index, citation impact index, international cooperation index, excellent article production index and methodologies including citation analysis, text mining.

2
이재윤(경기대학교) ; 최상희(대구가톨릭대학교) 2011, Vol.28, No.2, pp.11-36 https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.2.011
초록보기
초록

Abstract

Since the 1990s, informetrics has grown in popularity among information scientists. Today it is a general discipline that comprises all kinds of metrics, including bibliometrics and scientometrics. To illustrate the dynamic progress of this field, this study aims to identify the structure and infrastructure of the informetrics literature using statistical and profiling methods. Informetrics literature was obtained from the Web of Knowledge for the years 2001-2010. The selected articles contain least one of these keywords: ‘informetrics’, ‘bibliometrics’, ‘scientometrics’, ‘webometrics’, and ‘citation analysis.’ Noteworthy publication patterns of major countries were identified by a statistical method. Intellectual structure analysis shows major research areas, authors, and journals.

3
한종엽(한국해양과학기술원) 2015, Vol.32, No.1, pp.23-41 https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.1.023
초록보기
초록

이 연구는 국제학술지에 나타난 ‘동해’ 관련 연구에서 ‘동해’ 표기유형별 특성을 계량적으로 분석한 것이다. 이 때 동해표기 유형은 ‘동해 단독’, ‘일본해 단독’, ‘병행표기’로 구분하였다. 분석을 위해 Web of Science DB에서 총 4,192편을 대상으로, 표기유형별 시계열 변화, 저자 소속국가별 표기유형, 연구주제의 차이, 피인용도, 연구협력 및 공저 네트워크를 분석하였다. 그 결과 ‘동해’ 연구에서 ‘일본해 단독 표기’의 비율이 가장 많은 것으로 나타났고, 1990년대 이후 ‘동해 단독 표기’과 ‘병기’의 비율이 지속적으로 상승하고 있었다. 또한 ‘동해’ 연구의 핵심국가는 ‘일본’, ‘러시아’, ‘한국’, ‘미국’, ‘중국’ 5개국이며, ‘일본해 단독 표기’의 경우 ‘일본’을 중심으로 ‘미국’, ‘러시아’, ‘중국’과 공동연구가 활발히 이루어지며, ‘동해 단독 표기’와 ‘병기’는 ‘한국’ 연구자를 중심으로 ‘미국’, ‘일본’과의 연구의 비율이 높았다. 공저 네트워크는 ‘일본해 단독 표기’의 경우 하나의 “거대 구성집단”(Giant Component)을 형성하여 이(異) 집단 간의 협업이 활발히 이루어지고 있으나, ‘동해 단독 표기’의 경우 소속기관을 중심으로 소규모의 연구그룹이 분산된 것으로 나타났다.

Abstract

This study worked on the qualitative analysis about nomenclature East Sea by the record type in researches related to East Sea shown in the scientific journals. Here in this study, the way of marking is classified as three: ‘sole notation of East Sea’, ‘sole notation of Sea of Japan’, and ‘simultaneous notation of both’. Based on a total of 4,192 selections from Web of Science DB, the analysis was followed up for change in time series by the notation type, notation type according to the nation that authors belong to, difference in research topic, impact factor, collaboration in research, and co-authorship network. The result turned out in this work that the sole notation of Sea of Japan accounted for the largest portion. It also showed that the rates of sole notation of East Sea and simultaneous notation have kept increasing continuously since the 1990s. Hub nations regarding the research of East Sea is five including Japan, Russia, Korea, USA, and China. In the case of sole notation of Sea of Japan, active collaboration studies are performed in USA, Russia, and China with a focus in Japan. In the case of sole notation of East Sea and simultaneous use, the research rate is relatively high in USA and Japan with a focus in Korea. As to the co-authorship network in the sole notation of Sea of Japan, sort of a “giant component” among different groups has been set up and through which the collaborative works are actively underway. However, it was found that the research of sole notation of East Sea is dispersed into small groups on the base of relevant individual institution.

4
남은경(연세대학교) ; 박지홍(연세대학교) 2014, Vol.31, No.4, pp.201-227 https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.4.201
초록보기
초록

사회 전반적으로 협업의 중요성과 필요성이 강조되고 있으며, 연구자들의 협업 역시 증가하고 있다. 연구자의 협업에는 학자로서의 특성이 반영된다는 점에서 특이성을 가진다. 본 연구는 연구자 협업 패턴에 영향을 미치는 요인을 알아보기 위해 가설을 설정하고 이를 검증하였다. 영향 요인은 연구자들의 협업 행태 및 동기에 대한 선행연구를 토대로 추출하였으며, 계량정보학 분야 연구자들을 대상으로 네트워크 분석과 설문 분석의 두 가지 방법을 활용하여 가설을 검증하였다. 설문은 네트워크 분석에 포함된 연구자를 대상으로 한 웹 설문으로 진행하였다. 본 연구 결과는 연구자 인식 분석을 통한 개인적 선택 요인과 관계 계량정보학 분석을 통한 집단적 결과 요인을 분석했다는 점에서 의의가 있으며, 연구자 협업을 장려하는 정책 및 디지털 협업서비스 기획 등에 활용될 수 있을 것이라 기대된다.

Abstract

The collaboration is becoming ever more widespread in scientific research. Unlike collaboration in other areas such as in a company, research collaboration has an unique feature that it is reflected by scholars’ characteristics. Based on previous studies on research collaboration, five major factors are identified. We propose five hypotheses from them and examine these by using both in-person questionnaire survey and relational bibliometric analysis. The survey analysis informs individual choice factors and the bibliometric analysis informs collective consequence factors. The results of this study may have implications for science policies and digital collaboration services.

5
최정원(전북대학교) ; 강주연(전북대학교 기록관리학과) ; 박준형(전북대학교) ; 오효정(전북대학교) 2016, Vol.33, No.2, pp.135-156 https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.2.135
초록보기
초록

최근 이용자 중심의 기록관리에 대한 중요도가 높아짐에 따라, 공공기록관에서도 소셜 네트워크 서비스(Social Network Service: 이하 SNS)를 통해 기존 방식인 단방향이 아닌 쌍방향 활동으로 이용자와 소통을 유도하여 이용자 중심 서비스를 시도하고 있다. 본 연구의 목적은 공공기록관의 소셜미디어 이용 현황을 분석하고 그에 대한 이용자들의 관심도를 파악하는데 있다. 이를 위해 본 연구에서는 국가기록원과 대통령기록관 트위터를 선정, 2010년부터 2016년 4월 15일까지의 공공기록관과 관련 트윗(tweet)들을 수집하였고, 계량분석과 소셜미디어 분석 방법(노출추이분석, 시계열분석)을 적용하였다. 공공기록관에서 자체적으로 게시한 트윗과 일반 사용자가 게시한 트윗 집합간의 차이점을 분석하고, 공공기록관에 대한 이용자 관심이슈와 시계열에 의한 사회적 이슈간의 상관관계를 파악하였으며, 이를 통해 효과적인 소셜미디어 환경에서의 공공기록관 서비스 활용 방안을 제시한다.

Abstract

Recently, as the importance of user-oriented archives management is becoming increasingly, government archives try to serve interactive services using social network service (SNS) beyond one-way approaches. This study aims to analyze usage of government archives service in social media and examine users’ interestedness. We especially select “National Archives of Korea” and “Presidential Archives” as target government archives and collect tweets from 2010 to 15th April 2016. Our study adopts informetric approaches and social media analysis including buzz analysis, time series analysis. We differentiate between the tweet collection posted by government archives themselves and the other collection generated by general users. Furthermore we conduct correlation analysis of tweet and social issues and propose application plan for government archives services in social media environment.

6
박재신(연세대학교) ; 정영미(연세대학교) 2010, Vol.27, No.3, pp.83-102 https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.3.083
초록보기
초록

본 연구에서는 지구적 환경문제의 해결 방식으로서 환경과학 분야의 학술활동과 같은 학문적 접근 방식과 환경 NGO 중심의 환경운동과 같은 실천적 접근 방식을 두 가지 주요 흐름이라 보고, 이들 각각의 특성을 계량정보학적 분석을 통해 파악하고 비교하였다. 지난 10년 간 환경과학 분야에서 인용된 저널의 주제범주 간 동시인용 관계를 분석함으로써 이 분야의 지식 구조를 파악하였고, 환경 NGO의 웹 사이트에서 수집된 외부링크 데이터를 이용하여 이들의 관심 분야를 확인하였다. 또한 저널 논문과 NGO 뉴스에서 추출된 핵심어를 이용한 동시출현단어 분석을 통해 하위 주제를 파악하여 이들 간의 주제적 유사성과 상이성을 구체화하였다.

Abstract

This study aims to understand and compare the characteristics of two major approaches to solving global environmental problems-an academic approach including scholarly activities of environmental sciences and a practical approach of environmental movements led by NGOs-by employing informetric analysis methods. Knowledge structure of environmental sciences is depicted through co-citation networks of subject categories assigned to the cited journals in the discipline of environmental sciences for the 10-year period from 2000 to 2009. Furthermore, major interests of environmental NGOs are identified on the basis of external link data collected from web sites of the NGOs. Co-word analyses are also performed using the texts of journal papers in environmental sciences as well as news articles provided by NGO sites. Through the analyses, dominant subject areas of environmental sciences and environmental movements are identified demonstrating similarities and differences between the two approaches.

초록보기
초록

Abstract

Since information scientists have begun trying to quantify significant research trends in scientific publications, ‘-metrics’ research such as ‘bibliometrics’, ‘scientometrics’, ‘informetrics’, ‘webometrics’, and ‘citation analysis’ have been identified as crucial areas of information science. To illustrate the dynamic research activities in these areas, this study investigated the major contributors of ‘-metrics’ research for the last decade at three levels: nations, institutions, and documents. ‘-metrics’ literature of this study was obtained from the Science Citation Index for the years 2001-2011. In this analysis, we used Pathfinder network, PNNC algorithm, PageRank and several indicators based on h-index. In terms of international collaborations, USA and England were identified as major countries. At the institutional level, Katholieke University, Leuven and the University of Amsterdam in Europe and Indiana University and the Office of Naval Research in the USA have led co-research projects in informetrics areas. At the document level, Hirsch’s h-index paper and Ingwersen’s web impact factor paper were identified as the most influential work by two methods: PageRank and single paper h-index.

초록보기
초록

Abstract

In recent years, the changes in information technology have been so dramatic and the rate of changes has increased so much that information science research rigorously evolves with the passage of time and proliferates in diverging research directions dynamically. The aims of this study are to provide a global overview of research trends in information science and to trace its changes in the main topics over time. The study examined the topics of research articles published in JASIST between 1985 and 2009 and identified its changes during five 5 year periods. The study found that the most productive area has consistently been ‘Information Retrieval’, followed by ‘Informetrics’, ‘Information Use and Users’, ‘Network and Technology’, and ‘Publishing and Services’. Information retrieval is a predominant core area in Information Science covering computer-based handling of multimedia information, employment of new semantic methods from other disciplines, and mass information handling on virtual environments. Currently Informetric studies shift from finding existing phenomena to seeking valuable descriptive results and researchers of information use have concentrated especially on information-seeking aspects, so adding greater sophistication to the relatively simple approach taken in information retrieval.

9
김미설(전남대학교 대학원 문헌정보학과) ; 장우권(전남대학교) 2015, Vol.32, No.1, pp.171-204 https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.1.171
초록보기
초록

이 연구는 국내 전문학술지를 통해 국내 도서관마케팅의 도입 시기부터 현재까지 관련연구의 시대적 흐름에 따른 변화와 앞으로의 연구동향을 살펴보고, 향후 도서관마케팅 관련 주제 분야의 연구에 도움이 되는 기초 자료를 제시하는 데 있다. 이를 위해 문헌정보학 분야 전문 학술지인 ‘한국문헌정보학회지’, ‘한국비블리아학회지’, ‘한국도서관․정보학회지’, ‘정보관리학회지’의 창간호부터 2013년까지 발행된 전체논문 3,951편 중 선택된 키워드로 검색하여 중복된 논문 및 도서관마케팅과 관련이 없는 논문을 제외하고 최종 선정된 359편의 논문을 대상으로 항목별 세부분석을 통해 연구결과를 도출하였다. 이 연구의 결과, 연고별 연구논문 발표 추이, 기관별 연구논문 발표추이, 저자별 연구논문 발표추이, 영역별 연구논문 발표추이, 관종별 연구논문 발표추이가 나타났다.

Abstract

The objectives of this study are to examine changes in research on library marketing promotion from its introduction to the present using domestic journals carrying research papers on library marketing, to forecast research trends in the future, and to provide basic information for supporting future studies on subjects related to library marketing. There were a total of 3,951 papers published through the journals in the area of library and information science including ‘The Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science’, ‘The Journal of the Korea Biblia Society for Library and Information Science’, ‘The Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society’, and ‘The Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management’ from their first issues to the present. These papers were searched using selected keywords, and after redundant papers and those not related to library marketing were excluded, 359 papers were sampled for this study and analyzed from different aspects. Findings derived from this study, with regard to trends in research paper publishing by year, with regard to trends in research paper publishing by institution, with regard to trends in research paper publishing by author, with regard to trends in research paper publishing by area, and with regard to trends in research paper publishing by library type.

초록보기
초록

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify topic areas of academic library research using two informetric methods; word clustering and Pathfinder network. For the data analysis, 139 articles published in major library and information science journals from 2005 to 2009 were collected from the Korean Science Citation Index database. The keywords that represent research topics were gathered from two sections: an abstract and titles in references. Results showed that reference titles usefully represent topics in detail, and combining abstracts and reference titles can produce an expanded topic map.

정보관리학회지