초록

본 연구는 기존의 연구성과 분석의 한계를 극복하고 영향력이나 파급효과 등 질적 중심의 연구성과 분석을 위해 텍스트 마이닝, 인용 분석 등을 활용한 새로운 계량정보학적 분석지표를 제안하였다. 즉, 논문품질지수, 인용 영향력지수, 지식확산지수, 국제협력연구지수, 우수논문 생산지수 등 새로운 연구성과 분석지표를 제안하여 질적인 측면을 중심으로 한 연구성과 분석이 가능하도록 하였다. 그리고 제안된 지표를 활용하여 사례분석을 수행하여 그 가능성을 확인하였다.

Abstract

There are some limitations in the existing bibliometric methods to satisfy the various requests of the interest parties including researchers, managers, policy makers to identify 1) which research group or researcher is the key player, and the overall trends of the particular technological sub-fields, 2) which research groups, institutions or countries mainly use their research outputs, 3) what are the spin-offs from research outputs to some scientific and technological fields, 4) in which levels they are when comparing their quantitative and qualitative research outputs to those of other competitive institutions. It is essential to develop new informetric indicators and methodologies in order to satisfy stakeholder's various demands and to strengthen qualitative analysis in measuring research performance. This study suggested informetric indicators such as article quality index, citation impact index, international cooperation index, excellent article production index and methodologies including citation analysis, text mining.

초록

Abstract

Since information scientists have begun trying to quantify significant research trends in scientific publications, ‘-metrics’ research such as ‘bibliometrics’, ‘scientometrics’, ‘informetrics’, ‘webometrics’, and ‘citation analysis’ have been identified as crucial areas of information science. To illustrate the dynamic research activities in these areas, this study investigated the major contributors of ‘-metrics’ research for the last decade at three levels: nations, institutions, and documents. ‘-metrics’ literature of this study was obtained from the Science Citation Index for the years 2001-2011. In this analysis, we used Pathfinder network, PNNC algorithm, PageRank and several indicators based on h-index. In terms of international collaborations, USA and England were identified as major countries. At the institutional level, Katholieke University, Leuven and the University of Amsterdam in Europe and Indiana University and the Office of Naval Research in the USA have led co-research projects in informetrics areas. At the document level, Hirsch’s h-index paper and Ingwersen’s web impact factor paper were identified as the most influential work by two methods: PageRank and single paper h-index.

초록

이 연구는 정보관리학회지의 초록의 현황에 대한 조사와 분석을 통해 초록의 특징을 진단하고자 한다. 이를 위해 학회지의 저자초록을 중심으로 초록의 구성요소, 초록의 유형 등을 분석하였다. 대상초록은 1984년부터 2015년까지 간행된 학회지 논문이다. 그 결과 수록논문은 1,168편, 지시적 초록은 96.6%, 통보적 초록은 3.4%, 국어와 영어 병기 초록은 99.5%였다. 연구방법에서 문헌사례 52.8%, 설문조사 21.1%, 실험이 26.1%였다. 문단과 문장에서 1문단이 92.1%, 2문단 이상이 7.9%, 5문장 이하가 79%, 6문장 이상이 21%, 1인칭 사용이 90.5%로 나타났다. 주제영역은 도서관/정보센터경영 19.4%, 정보서비스 17.3%, 정보공학 16.4%, 정보검색 15.1%, 계량정보 9.6% 등의 순으로 나타났다.

Abstract

This study aims to identify the characteristics of abstracts by analyzing the status of abstracts published in ‘Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management.’ To this end, the study analyzed the components of and the types of abstracts. Target abstracts were those published in the journal from 1984 to 2015. The journal published 1,168 articles with indicative abstracts accounting for 96.6%, informative abstracts 3.4%, and abstracts written in both English and Korean 99.5%. As for research methods, case study through literature review was 52.8%, surveys 21.1%, and experimentation 26.1%. The percentage of abstracts consisting of one paragraph was 92.1%, more than two paragraphs were 7.9%, fewer than 5 sentences were 79%, and 6 sentences or more were 21%. The use of the first person was 90.5%. In terms of topic areas, library and information center management was 19.4%, information services 17.3%, information technology 16.2%, information retrieval 15.1%, and informetrics 9.6%, etc.