초록

개방형 네트워크인 인터넷의 확산과 웹(Web) 기술이 발전함에 따라 다양한 형태의 전자문서가 생산 및 유통되고 있다. 전자문서(e-Document)는 문서를 생산한 기관에서 일련의 행위를 유발하기 위한 정보 또는 내용을 포함하는 기록물의 일종이다. 본 연구에서는 이러한 전자문서의 안전한 이용 및 유통을 위하여 요구되는 보안 알고리즘을 제안하였다. 특히, 제안된 방법은 전자문서의 진본성(Authenticity), 신뢰성(Reliability), 무결성(Integrity)을 보장하기 위한 전자서명의 생성과 이용자의 정당성 확보를 위한 인증과정에 적용할 수 있다. 또한, 보안성과 저장성에 있어서 높은 신뢰도를 가지고 있는 스마트카드를 활용함으로써 기존의 방법에 비하여 높은 보안성을 확보할 수 있었다. 제안된 방법의 효율성 및 신뢰성에 대한 검증을 위하여 실험을 수행하였다.

Abstract

With explosive growth in the area of the Internet and IT services, various types of e-documents are generated and circulated. An e-Document is a sort of electronic records which a organization performs works and goals. In this study, we propose a security algorithm for secure use and distribution of e-documents. Especially, the proposed method can be applied to generate digital signature which can guarantee authenticity, integrity, confidentiality of an e-document and authenticate authorized users. Also, we can get higher security level as using a smart card that provides highly storing capacity and security. We carried out an experiment to verify efficiency and security of the proposed method.

초록

Abstract

Although it has been a long subject of study why researchers prefer some cited documents to others, the existing relative researches have had a variety of perspectives on the nature and complexity of the citation behavior and not provided a complete answer to this question. In particular, Korea researchers mainly used statistical analysis of bibliographic information, which has limitations in revealing dynamic and complex cognitive aspects of the citation process. In this study, I investigate the citer perception of citing motives and bibliographic factors through survey and compared the responses according to the researchers’ characteristics. After extracting the 22 motivations and 21 factors through the literature analysis and configuring a 5-point Likert scale questions, I conducted a survey in the wat of an e-mail attachment. From the SPSS 22.0, the frequency analysis, t-test, and one-way ANOVA were performed on the 354 valid samples. As a result, it is found that supporting is considered the most important citing motive and social connection, self-citation have little influence. In the case of bibliographic factors, the journal’s reputation was recognized the most influential factor and the number of pages and authors was the least. Significant differences in fields of study and research careers were showed in some parts. These results can substantiate earlier studies, determine whether the factors assumed influential in selecting references were intended, and suggest the search point to the specialty library or academic database.