초록

국내 문헌정보학 분야에서 10년간 발표된 논문의 저자와 인용빈도를 대상으로 공저 네트워크에서의 중심성과 연구성과 지수 사이의 관계를 분석하였다. 특히 공저를 고려하지 않고 연구성과 지수를 산출하는 경우와 공저를 고려하여 연구성과 지수를 산출하는 경우로 나누어서 분석하였다. 또한 저자 집단을 논문 수에 따라 다르게 설정하여 지수 사이의 상관관계를 분석한 결과, 연구자의 인용지수와 연구자 중심성 사이의 상관관계에 대한 선행 연구의 일관성없는 결과를 설명해낼 수 있었다. 전체적으로 공저 활동의 정도는 연구성과와 상관관계가 유의하지 않았으며 일부에서는 오히려 부정적인 상관관계를 가진 것으로 나타났다. 중심성과 연구성과 사이의 관계는 통계적으로 유의한 긍정적인 상관관계가 나타났으나 상위 저자 30명만을 대상으로 분석한 결과에서는 상관관계가 유의하지 않았다.

Abstract

We analyzed the relationships between the co-authorship network centralities and the research performance indicators with the authors and the number of citations of the papers published for 10 years in Korean library and information science journals. In particular, the research performance indicators were calculated with normal counting and with fractional counting also. As a result of correlation analysis between the variables by setting the different ranges of the author groups to be analyzed according to the number of articles, it was possible to explain the inconsistent results of the previous studies on the correlations between the researchers' citation indicators and their co-authorship network centralities. Overall, the degree of co-authorship activities measured by collaboration coefficient showed no or negatively correlated with research performance. There were statistically significant positive correlations between the centralities and the research performance indicators, but the correlation was not significant in the analysis of the top 30 authors by number of articles.

초록

Abstract

This study aims at proposing three prestige indices—closeness prestige, input domain, and proximity prestige- as useful measures for the impact of a particular node in citation networks. It compares these prestige indices with other impact indices as it is still unknown what dimensions of impact these indices actually measure. The prestige indices enable us to distinguish the most prominent actors in a directed network, similar to the centrality indices in undirected networks. Correlation analysis and principal component analysis were conducted on the author citation network to identify the differentiated implications of the three prestige indices from the existing impact indices. We selected simple citation counting, h-index, PageRank, and the three kinds of centrality indices which assume undirected networks as the existing impact measures for comparison with the three prestige indices. The results indicate that these prestige indices demonstrate distinct impact dimension from the other impact indices. The prestige indices reflect indirect impact while the others direct impact.

초록

Abstract

Although it has been a long subject of study why researchers prefer some cited documents to others, the existing relative researches have had a variety of perspectives on the nature and complexity of the citation behavior and not provided a complete answer to this question. In particular, Korea researchers mainly used statistical analysis of bibliographic information, which has limitations in revealing dynamic and complex cognitive aspects of the citation process. In this study, I investigate the citer perception of citing motives and bibliographic factors through survey and compared the responses according to the researchers’ characteristics. After extracting the 22 motivations and 21 factors through the literature analysis and configuring a 5-point Likert scale questions, I conducted a survey in the wat of an e-mail attachment. From the SPSS 22.0, the frequency analysis, t-test, and one-way ANOVA were performed on the 354 valid samples. As a result, it is found that supporting is considered the most important citing motive and social connection, self-citation have little influence. In the case of bibliographic factors, the journal’s reputation was recognized the most influential factor and the number of pages and authors was the least. Significant differences in fields of study and research careers were showed in some parts. These results can substantiate earlier studies, determine whether the factors assumed influential in selecting references were intended, and suggest the search point to the specialty library or academic database.

초록

본 연구는 결혼이주여성들의 도서관 이용의 어려움을 도서관 불안 척도를 통해 측정하고 이를 해결할 수 있는 방안에 대해 제안하였다. 연구방법은 광주에 위치한 공공도서관 5곳에서 2015년 12월부터 2016년 3월까지 도서관 불안에 관한 설문조사를 실시하여 137명의 응답을 분석에 활용하였다. 연구결과, 결혼이주여성들의 전체 도서관 불안 점수는 5점 척도에서 2.91점으로 기존의 선행연구들과 비교하여 비교적 높은 편이었다. 개인특성에 따른 도서관 불안 결과를 분석해 본 결과 한국어 능력, 남편직업, 이용목적, 방문횟수, 도서관거리, 그리고 모국경험의 차이에 따라 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다. 연구결과를 바탕으로 결혼이주여성의 도서관 불안 완화를 위한 방안을 제안하였다.

Abstract

This study investigated the difficulty of married immigrant women in the use of library with LAS (Library Anxiety Scale). The data were collected by LAS survey with 137 married immigrant women in five public libraries in Gwangju from December 2015 to March 2016. As the results, married immigrant women’s average anxiety score was 2.91 points which is comparatively higher than the results of previous studies. The statistical analysis of library anxiety scores with personal factors showed statistically significant result in several factors such as Korean skill, spouse’s job, purpose of using library, visiting count of library, distance between home and library, and experience from their homeland. Finally this study proposed several suggestions to reduce married immigrant women’s anxiety from library.

초록

본 연구는 학제성이 강한 HCI 연구 내에서 문헌정보학 분야 연구가 수행한 연구내용과 역할을 분석하고 향후 타 학문분야와의 협력 가능성 및 수행 가능한 연구주제를 살펴보고자 하였다. 연구에서 사용된 데이터는 문헌정보학 분야의 대표적인 국내 학술지 및 한국HCI학회 학술대회의 발표논문집에서 추출한 키워드와 소속 정보이며, 이들을 활용하여 네트워크 분석과 빈도 분석을 하였다. 국내 HCI 분야에서는 정보통신, 컴퓨터공학, 기술산업 등이 활발한 교류를 보이고 있었으며, 문헌정보학은 연구 협력에 있어서 비교적 소극적이었다. 문헌정보학 연구의 HCI 분야 내 역할을 살펴본 결과, 타 분야와 협력이 필요한 전문적인 주제에 대해서는 그 관심도가 높지 않음을 발견했다. 그러나 문헌정보학 분야 학술지에 타 학문분야 연구자들이 HCI 관련 논문을 다수 게재했다는 점과 기술산업 분야와도 어느 정도 연결성을 가지고 있다는 점에서, 향후 문헌정보학 분야가 기술산업 등 타 분야와의 협력을 통한 공동연구를 적극적으로 수행한다면 학계 간의 연구주제 확장 및 발전에 기여할 수 있음을 발견하였다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze how the Library and Information Science (LIS) related research efforts in Korea contributed to the progress of the Human Computer Interaction (HCI) discipline to identify the potential collaboration research partners and topics. The following data was used for the network and frequency analysis: titles, keywords and affiliation information extracted from the Korean journals serving the LIS fields as well as the conference proceedings of the Korean HCI society. Information communication technology, computer engineering, and technology industry had been active in research collaborations but LIS field was comparatively not active. This study was able to determine that LIS researchers carried out important research but they had not much interests in the topics that required interdisciplinary collaboration. However, there were a number of papers, which were not authored by LIS discipline researchers, in the LIS related journals. In addition, there are a few ongoing interdisciplinary research projects which included LIS researchers. This reveals that it is possible for the LIS field could play an important role in the future if the researchers actively participate the collaborative projects.