초록

이 연구는 한국의 정신의학 분야 국제공동연구 활성화를 위하여, 네트워크 분석에 중점을 두어 정신의학 분야 국제공동연구의 핵심 연구동향을 반영하는 지적구조를 규명하였다. 이를 위해 데이터는 Web of Science를 기반으로 수집하였으며, 검색 대상 기간은 2009년에서 2013년까지로 하였다. 고급검색 기능을 통해 정신의학 연구 분야를 의미하는 SU=“psychiatry”의 검색 식을 사용하였으며, 국제공동연구만을 선택해 총 18,590건의 논문을 수집하였다. 총 18,590건 논문의 저자 키워드와 WoS에서 부여한 키워드를 합쳐 최종 선정된 85개 키워드를 대상으로 분석한 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 질환을 중심으로 총 8개의 세부 주제 영역을 확인하였다. 둘째, 높은 영향력을 가지며 다른 키워드들 간의 매개를 도모하여 주제영역을 확장시키는 총 6개의 핵심 키워드를 확인하였다. 셋째, 커뮤니티 분석을 통해 한국연구재단의 학문분류표를 이용하여 세부 주제영역으로 규명한 결과 총 15군집, 총 12세부 주제영역을 확인하였다.

Abstract

This study clarified the intellectual structure of international collaboration in psychiatry based on analyzing networks in order to vitalize for international collaboration in psychiatry in South Korea. The data set was collected from Web of Science citation database during the period from 2009 to 2013. SU=“psychiatry” search formulary (means field of psychiatric medical research) was used through advanced retrieval function and a total of 18,590 articles were selected among international collaborations. A total of 85 different keywords were selected from the 18,590 articles, and the results of analysis were as follows. First, this study examined 8 sub-subject areas focusing on disorders, and found that major subject areas could be divided into a total of 8 sub-subject areas. Second, this study examined 6 keywords that have a strong impact, and extend subject areas by promoting intermediation between other keywords Third, this study examined sub-subject areas by using the Knowledge Classification Scheme of the National Research Foundation of Korea through community analysis, and found a total of 15 clusters and a total of 12 sub-subject areas.

초록

이 연구는 한국의 정신의학 국제공동연구 협력망 구축을 위하여, 네트워크 분석에 중점을 두어 정신의학 국제공동연구의 공저관계를 반영하는 지식구조를 규명하였다. 먼저 국가 레벨에서의 지식구조 분석 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 5년 간 공동연구 비율은 89.97%로 높은 편이며, 시간의 경과에 따라 국제공동연구의 비율은 증가함을 확인하였다. 둘째, 아시아 국가들 간의 협업은 저조한 상태임을 확인하였다. 셋째, 국제공동연구 논문 수 및 중심성 값이 가장 높은 국가(또는 집단)는 EU-28로 확인되었다. 또한 연구성과 레벨에서의 지식구조 분석 결과는 다음과 같다. 중심성과 연구성과와의 상관관계를 분석하였으며, 분석 결과 세 가지 중심성 지표 간에는 정적 상관관계가 나타났고 중심성이 높은 국가는 연구성과도 좋았다.

Abstract

This study clarified the knowledge structure of international collaboration in psychiatry based on analyzing networks in order to construct cooperation networks for international collaboration in psychiatry in South Korea. The result of analysis of knowledge structure at a state-level is as follows. First, this study found that the rate of collaboration for five years is high as 89.97%. Moreover, this study investigated the change of rate of collaboration and international collaboration according to the passage of time, and ascertained that while the rate of international collaboration has increased, Second, this study examined the trend of research on collaboration between Asian countries, and found that collaboration between Asian countries is on a low level. Third, the country (or group) that the number of papers of international collaboration and the value of centrality are the highest is EU-28. The result of analysis of knowledge structure at a research output-level is as follows. this study analyzed the correlation of centrality with research output, and found that positive correlation exists in the three indicators of centrality, and a country with high centrality has good research output.

초록

Abstract

This exploratory study outlines the rationalization of why Ontology’s taxonomy requires a strong hierarchy, accuracy, and interoperability in order to be used as a successfully re-useable information management system. Finding the relevant information in a plethora of possible resources by bridging the gap between the user’s needs and the resources of the information technology system is the goal that the information management field should find a way to achieve. This study is based on discussions and interviews with a taxonomist, information architect, and information manager, whose discussions were based on the usability and interoperability of the knowledge based information systems. These professional perspectives are necessary as they are the liaison between users and the information technology group. We found that in order for information managers to ensure successful sharing of knowledge across the end users, a common sense language must be issued in order to achieve reasoning for the artificial intelligence system.

초록

본 연구에서는 웹, IPTV 등의 콘텐츠 유통망에서의 개인화 추천서비스를 위하여 이용자의 콘텐츠 이용행위와 콘텐츠의 위치정보를 활용한 추천방법을 제안하고 있다. 추천방법의 성능향상을 위하여 이용자 및 콘텐츠 프로파일 생성방법과 함께, 이용자의 콘텐츠 이용행위를 암묵적 이용자 피드백으로서 학습과정에 적용하여 이용자 선호도를 분석하였다. 학습과정에서의 이용자 선호도 분석을 위하여 협업여과추천방법 및 내용기반추천방법을 적용하였다. 또한 보다 정확한 추천을 위한 최종 콘텐츠 추천을 위하여 웹사이트 상의 콘텐츠에 대한 위치정보를 활용한 추천방법을 제안하고 있다. 이를 통하여 보다 효율적이고 정확한 추천 서비스의 제공이 가능할 수 있다.

Abstract

In this paper, we propose user contents using behavior and location information on contents on various channels, such as web, IPTV, for contents distribution. With methods to build user and contents profiles, contents using behavior as an implicit user feedback was applied into machine learning procedure for updating user profiles and contents preference. In machine learning procedure, contents-based and collaborative filtering methods were used to analyze user's contents preference. This study proposes contents location information on web sites for final recommendation contents as well. Finally, we refer to a generalized recommender system for personalization. With those methods, more effective and accurate recommendation service can be possible.

초록

우리나라 의학도서관의 인쇄본 학술지 공동보존체제를 구축하기 위하여, 선행 연구와 사례를 통해 공동보존의 유형과 발전현황을 고찰하고, 한국의학도서관협의회 회원도서관들을 대상으로 인쇄본 학술지 폐기 실태와 공간현황 및 공동보존 요구도와 참여의지 및 선호방식 등을 조사하였다. 분석 결과에 기초하여, 기존의 MEDLIS 인프라를 활용한 집중형과 분산형으로 구성된 하이브리드 모형을 제안하였으며, 기본사항과 세부내용, 단계별 시행추진 전략을 제시하였다. 마지막으로 성공적인 구현을 위한 한국의학도서관협의회의 노력을 제언하였다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a collaborative print journal preservation model for the medical libraries in Korea. After reviewing previous studies and advanced preservation practices, a survey was administered to the members of the Korean Medical Library Association to collect data about the present states of journal weeding and storage space as well as their needs and preferences for collaborative preservation. Based on the analysis, a hybrid model, consisting of centralized and distributed archives, is proposed with MEDLIS as infra structure. Detailed characteristics and three phases of implement strategies are described. Finally, recommendations for the Korean Medical Library Association to the successful substantiation are suggested.

초록

협동 디지털참고서비스의 이용자 정보요구를 파악하기 위하여, 국립중앙도서관의 ‘사서에게 물어보세요’에 2014년 전반기에 실제로 접수된 질문엔트리(N=661)를 대상으로, 질문의 수와 본질, 주제, 정보요구 발생정황, 이용자가 원하는 최종산물, 사서의 활동, 답변에 사용된 정보원 등을 분석하였다. 엔트리에 포함된 평균 질문 수는 1.17건이며 순수참고질문은 77.82%로 나타났다. 주제별로는 총류가 45.68%를 차지하고, 요구정황은 부과된 질문이 주를 이루었으며(84.17%), 이용자가 원하는 최종산물은 서지에(60.48%) 집중되었다. 사서의 활동은 문헌탐색(37.67%), 연구조사(19.67%), 사실탐색(18.67%) 순서이다. 답변제공에 사용된 정보원은 이차자료가 지배적이었으며(73.62%), 각종 웹사이트도 14.75%를 차지하고 있다. 부문별 세부항목별 내용을 분석하였으며, 결과에 기초하여 디지털참고서비스 진흥을 위한 도서관계의 노력을 제언하였다.

Abstract

This study analyses the questions addressed to the collaborative digital reference service run by the National Library of Korea. The data consist of 661 question entries to the 'Ask a Librarian' service during first 6 months in 2014. Each entry includes average 1.17 questions, and 77.82% of the total questions are real reference in nature. Questions are analyzed by classification division, context of the questioner, desired end product, activities of librarians, and the resources used to respond them. Each category is subdivided and analyzed in detail. Results revealed interesting findings and problems, and suggestions for further endeavor are provided.

초록

Abstract

Since information scientists have begun trying to quantify significant research trends in scientific publications, ‘-metrics’ research such as ‘bibliometrics’, ‘scientometrics’, ‘informetrics’, ‘webometrics’, and ‘citation analysis’ have been identified as crucial areas of information science. To illustrate the dynamic research activities in these areas, this study investigated the major contributors of ‘-metrics’ research for the last decade at three levels: nations, institutions, and documents. ‘-metrics’ literature of this study was obtained from the Science Citation Index for the years 2001-2011. In this analysis, we used Pathfinder network, PNNC algorithm, PageRank and several indicators based on h-index. In terms of international collaborations, USA and England were identified as major countries. At the institutional level, Katholieke University, Leuven and the University of Amsterdam in Europe and Indiana University and the Office of Naval Research in the USA have led co-research projects in informetrics areas. At the document level, Hirsch’s h-index paper and Ingwersen’s web impact factor paper were identified as the most influential work by two methods: PageRank and single paper h-index.

초록

국내 문헌정보학 분야에서 10년간 발표된 논문의 저자와 인용빈도를 대상으로 공저 네트워크에서의 중심성과 연구성과 지수 사이의 관계를 분석하였다. 특히 공저를 고려하지 않고 연구성과 지수를 산출하는 경우와 공저를 고려하여 연구성과 지수를 산출하는 경우로 나누어서 분석하였다. 또한 저자 집단을 논문 수에 따라 다르게 설정하여 지수 사이의 상관관계를 분석한 결과, 연구자의 인용지수와 연구자 중심성 사이의 상관관계에 대한 선행 연구의 일관성없는 결과를 설명해낼 수 있었다. 전체적으로 공저 활동의 정도는 연구성과와 상관관계가 유의하지 않았으며 일부에서는 오히려 부정적인 상관관계를 가진 것으로 나타났다. 중심성과 연구성과 사이의 관계는 통계적으로 유의한 긍정적인 상관관계가 나타났으나 상위 저자 30명만을 대상으로 분석한 결과에서는 상관관계가 유의하지 않았다.

Abstract

We analyzed the relationships between the co-authorship network centralities and the research performance indicators with the authors and the number of citations of the papers published for 10 years in Korean library and information science journals. In particular, the research performance indicators were calculated with normal counting and with fractional counting also. As a result of correlation analysis between the variables by setting the different ranges of the author groups to be analyzed according to the number of articles, it was possible to explain the inconsistent results of the previous studies on the correlations between the researchers' citation indicators and their co-authorship network centralities. Overall, the degree of co-authorship activities measured by collaboration coefficient showed no or negatively correlated with research performance. There were statistically significant positive correlations between the centralities and the research performance indicators, but the correlation was not significant in the analysis of the top 30 authors by number of articles.

초록

Abstract

This study aims to answer whether social tagging through user collaboration could be utilized for the creation of digital knowledge of the web, and whether we could verify the quality and efficacy of social tagging to obtain benefits from it. In particular, this paper examines the inter-indexer consistency of social tagging in comparison to professional indexing. It employs two different similarity measures, both of which are based on the Vector Space Model to deal with numerous indexers. It contributes to the utilization of social tagging in the organization of the web, and encourages to adopt social knowledge in developing suitable vocabularies for resources newly generated in the digital library environment. Furthermore, the comparative analysis with two different measures produced more credible results by illustrating a similar pattern of indexing tendency in both measures.

초록

This study examines basic concepts and characteristics of QuestionPoint, the typical model of Collaborative Digital Reference Service and Global Reference Network, and analyzes the case of Question포인트 service at Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information where the service is initiated first time in Korea by developing Korean interface. 114 reference questions were analyzed, and questionnaires were sent to 63 service users to find out their overall attitudes and degree of satisfaction. Some suggestions were made by discussing the necessity of the enhancement of CDRS and mutual cooperation among Korean libraries.

Abstract