초록

이 연구의 목적은 인문학분야를 대상으로 인용DB간 구축 정보를 비교하고 차이가 있는 경우 그 원인과 문제점을 분석하여 구축 정보의 정확성을 향상시킬 수 있는 방안을 제시하는데 있다. 이를 위해 인용정보를 구성하는 주요 항목 중의 하나인 피인용횟수를 기준으로 네이버와 KCI에서 국내학술논문을 비교하였다. 조사결과, KCI가 네이버보다 좀 더 정확한 인용정보를 제공하고 있었지만 그 차이는 크지 않았다. 각 인용DB간 차이의 원인은 수록범위의 불완전성, 서지정보의 오류, 참고문헌 구축의 불완전성, 링크와 관련된 오류 등으로 조사되었다. 두 인용DB 모두 개선의 여지가 남아있으며, 양자를 상호보완적으로 활용한다면 인문학 분야에서 더욱 완전한 인용정보를 파악할 수 있을 것이다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify differences between KCI and Naver Scholar as citation analysis tools. Four subcategories in the humanities category were selected as the subject of study. The recall of Naver Scholar was 64%(2,227 times) and the KCI's was 77%(2,665 times). There were some differences in the results at the individual article level or the subcategory level, but the gaps were not significant. Therefore, researchers who analyze citations are urged to use both databases because neither of them are complete, but supplementary to each other.

초록

본 연구의 목적은 저자키워드의 출현빈도와 해당 키워드가 속한 논문들의 총피인용횟수 간 상관관계 여부를 확인하고자 하는 것이다. 연구의 배경은 인문사회과학 분야 학술용어사전을 구축하는데 있어서 실제 연구에서의 활용도가 높고 다른 키워드와의 의미적 연관관계가 많은 학술용어를 추출하기 위한 방법론을 개발해 보고자 하는 것이다. 본 연구의 목적을 이루기 위해 한국연구재단 한국학술지인용색인(KCI)에 수록된 2007년에서 2011년까지의 인문학 및 사회과학 분야 학술지 논문의 저자키워드와 피인용횟수를 분석하였다. 분석 결과 저자키워드의 출현빈도와 해당 키워드가 속한 논문들의 총피인용횟수는 통계적으로 상관관계가 있으며, 저자키워드의 출현빈도가 늘어날수록 논문의 총피인용횟수도 많아지는 것으로 나타났다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to verify the correlation between the appearance frequency of author keyword and the number of citation in journal articles. In this study, we were trying to develop a methodology that can select the term having semantic relation with other terms and higher utilization to build a structured scientific glossary. In order to achieve this purpose, we analyzed the number of citation and the author keyword of the humanities and social science journal articles of the Korea Citation Index (KCI) from 2007 to 2011. This study found a correlation between appearance frequency of author keyword and the number of citation of the journal articles, with higher appearance frequency of author keyword of the journal articles being more cited.

초록

본 연구에서는 ‘학술지의 피인용횟수 순위’를 적용한 tapered h-지수의 변형지표 Kor-hT를 고안하여 제안하였다. Kor-hT의 의미를 평가하기 위하여 Kor-hT 지수 값의 중복률 및 지수 값과 평가요소 사이의 연관성 변화를 다른 학술지 평가지표인 h-지수, tapered h-지수 및 IF와 비교 분석하였다. 지수 값의 중복률 분석은 지표의 변별력을 살펴보기 위한 것이며, 지수 값과 평가요소와의 상관관계 분석은 지표의 평가요소인 피인용횟수 및 논문 수가 지수 값에 각각 어떻게 반영되는지를 알아보기 위한 것이다. 분석을 위해 2008년부터 2010년까지의 한국학술지인용색인(KCI) 3개년 데이터를 사용하였다. 분석 결과 본 연구에서 제안한 Kor-hT가 비교 대상 지표에 비해 지수 값의 중복률이 가장 낮아 높은 변별력을 보였으며, 지수 값과 평가요소와의 상관관계에 있어서도 피인용횟수와 논문 수 모두에서 상관관계가 가장 높은 것으로 나타났다.

Abstract

This study describes the meaning of and the formula for Kor-hT, which is a modified index built on the tapered h-index by applying ‘the ranking according to the number of citations of journals’. This study evaluated the de-duplication rate of index values of Kor-hT and analyzed the change in the correlation between the index values and evaluation elements using the Korea Citation Index data from 2008 to 2010. Kor-hT is compared with h-index, tapered h-index, and IF. As a result, Kor-hT appeared to be superior to other indexes on de-duplication rate. It is also shown that there is a very strong positive correlation between the evaluation elements, the number of citations and the number of articles of journals, and the index values of Kor-hT.

초록

Abstract

Since information scientists have begun trying to quantify significant research trends in scientific publications, ‘-metrics’ research such as ‘bibliometrics’, ‘scientometrics’, ‘informetrics’, ‘webometrics’, and ‘citation analysis’ have been identified as crucial areas of information science. To illustrate the dynamic research activities in these areas, this study investigated the major contributors of ‘-metrics’ research for the last decade at three levels: nations, institutions, and documents. ‘-metrics’ literature of this study was obtained from the Science Citation Index for the years 2001-2011. In this analysis, we used Pathfinder network, PNNC algorithm, PageRank and several indicators based on h-index. In terms of international collaborations, USA and England were identified as major countries. At the institutional level, Katholieke University, Leuven and the University of Amsterdam in Europe and Indiana University and the Office of Naval Research in the USA have led co-research projects in informetrics areas. At the document level, Hirsch’s h-index paper and Ingwersen’s web impact factor paper were identified as the most influential work by two methods: PageRank and single paper h-index.

초록

Abstract

Even though the overall scholarly community has recognized a dramatic growth and changes in the Information Science research in Korea over the last few decades, there are still only few studies that have identified the changes in terms of long-term and dynamic point of view. We have analyzed 1,007 IS-research articles from leading Korean journals in KCI (Korea Citation Index), published between 2000 and 2011. To discern the trendline of changes in research interests over time, we conducted a time-series analysis by developing grounded subject scheme from the article set and checking the growth rate of the number of published articles and title keywords. A comparative analysis was also conducted by constructing and comparing co-word maps over time to discover visible changes in research topics over this 12-year period of the IS-research in Korea. As a result, we identified some developments and transformations in major subject areas and knowledge structure of the IS-research in Korea over time. The major trend we discovered is that IS-studies over the 12-year period evolved from system-oriented research to library-application research. The changes are especially observed in knowledge management, Web-based system evaluation, and information retrieval areas. When compared to the results of other studies, the result of our study may serve as an evidence of the localization of Korean IS-studies in the first decade of the 21st century.