초록

본 연구의 목적은 공개 소프트웨어를 활용하여 지역 축제기록을 보존․활용할 수 있는 전자기록관리시스템을 구축하고, 사용한 공개 소프트웨어를 비교하여 축제 기록에 적합한 공개 소프트웨어를 평가하는 것이다. 본 연구의 적용 대상 축제로 춘향제를 선정하였으며, 현재 춘향제 기록관리의 문제점을 제기하여 그 중 축제기록을 보존할 시스템이 없다는 점을 제시하였다. 이후, 기록관리용 공개 소프트웨어인 AtoM(Access to Memory)와 OMEKA를 활용하여 축제기록관리시스템을 구현하였다. 구축된 각각의 시스템을 지역 축제기록의 특성에 따라 비교한 결과, AtoM 기반 축제기록관리시스템이 지역 축제기록의 보존․활용에 더욱 적합한 것으로 나타났다.

Abstract

This study aims to implement the electronic record management systems that can preserve and utilize local festival records and archives. To accomplish the goal, this study used open source software for Namwon chunhyang festival as a case. This paper revealed the fact that there is no constructive system for preserving local festival records. To solve this problem, this study implemented electonic records management system based on Open Source Softwares, which are called AtoM(Access to Memory) and OMEKA. Also, both OSSs were compared and evaluated according to Characteristics of Local festival records. As a result, ERMS for Festival based on AtoM was appropriate comparatively.

초록

Abstract

Although it has been a long subject of study why researchers prefer some cited documents to others, the existing relative researches have had a variety of perspectives on the nature and complexity of the citation behavior and not provided a complete answer to this question. In particular, Korea researchers mainly used statistical analysis of bibliographic information, which has limitations in revealing dynamic and complex cognitive aspects of the citation process. In this study, I investigate the citer perception of citing motives and bibliographic factors through survey and compared the responses according to the researchers’ characteristics. After extracting the 22 motivations and 21 factors through the literature analysis and configuring a 5-point Likert scale questions, I conducted a survey in the wat of an e-mail attachment. From the SPSS 22.0, the frequency analysis, t-test, and one-way ANOVA were performed on the 354 valid samples. As a result, it is found that supporting is considered the most important citing motive and social connection, self-citation have little influence. In the case of bibliographic factors, the journal’s reputation was recognized the most influential factor and the number of pages and authors was the least. Significant differences in fields of study and research careers were showed in some parts. These results can substantiate earlier studies, determine whether the factors assumed influential in selecting references were intended, and suggest the search point to the specialty library or academic database.