초록

본 연구에서는 Y세대의 특징을 밝히고 Y세대가 요구하는 차세대디지털도서관서비스를 도출하고자 하였으며, 이들의 요구가 베이비붐세대와 어느 정도 차이를 보이는지를 비교하고자 하였다. 연구결과, 첫째, Y세대가 가장 많이 이용하는 디지털기기는 휴대폰 또는 스마트폰으로 나타났고, 다음으로 데스크탑 PC, 노트북 PC, 디지털 카메라 순으로 나타났으며, 사용비율에 있어서 약간의 차이는 있지만 그 순위는 베이비붐세대와 거의 유사하게 나타났다. 둘째, 이용하는 디지털서비스에 있어서 Y세대와 베이비붐세대는 상당한 차이를 보이고 있는 것으로 분석되었으며, Y세대는 인터넷 포털을 가장 많이 이용하고 베이비붐세대는 이메일서비스를 가장 많이 이용하는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, Y세대와 베이비붐세대가 차세대디지털도서관에 요구하는 서비스를 클라우드서비스, 무한창조공간, 빅데이터, 증강현실, 구글글래스, 상황인식기술, 시맨틱서비스, SNS서비스, 디지털교과서서비스, RFID 및 QRCode 서비스, 도서관공간구성, 최첨단디스플레이기술, 기타 획기적인 서비스로 구분하여 조사한 결과, Y세대가 가장 높은 요구도를 보인 서비스는 빅데이터서비스였고, 베이비붐세대는 디지털교과서서비스였다.

Abstract

This study attempted to reveal the characteristics of the Y generation, to derive the services of the next generation digital library, and to compare differences between the demands of the baby boom generation and the Y generation to some extent. As a result, first, it is shown that the digital device the Y generation uses the most, was a cell phone or smartphone, followed by desktop PC, notebook PC, and digital camera. Although there were some differences, the Y generation’s use ratio of digital devices was substantially similar to the baby boomers’. Second, there was a significant difference between the Y generation and baby boom generation in terms of using digital services. While the Y generation used internet portals the most, the baby boom generation used e-mail service the most. Third, we surveyed the services which the Y generation and baby boom generation require for the next generation digital libraries, by grouping as follows: the cloud service, infinite creative space (maker space), big data, augmented reality, Google Glass, context-aware technologies, semantic services, SNS service, digital textbook service, RFID and QRCode service, library space configuration, a state-of-the-art display technology, and other innovative services. While the most demanded service by the Y generation was big data service, the baby boom generation most demanded digital textbook service.

초록

Abstract

The success of social networking sites (SNSs) may depend on many factors. Continuance use of SNSs is one of these. Especially, in the Web environment where users can leave one service with a single mouse click, maintaining existing members cost much time and efforts. Without continuance use of SNSs, SNS-based service would not create any value. This study focused on identifying factors influencing users’ continuance intention in SNSs. Based on relevant literature review, six influencing factors were initially identified. They were reputation, relational capital, knowledge quality, compatibility, personalization, and satisfaction. Web-based ques- tionnaire survey was conducted and a total of 325 usable responses were collected. Reliability test and two rounds of exploratory factor analyses resulted in identifying five factors. The relationship between the factors and the continuance intention was tested by using multiple regression analyses. The analyses revealed that satisfaction was the most significant factor. Knowledge quality and relational capital also had significant effects while reputation and personalization did not have significant effect on continuance intention. Instead, reputation and personalization showed significance in influencing satisfaction.

초록

본 연구는 대학도서관 업무의 수행 형태와 요소의 변화를 시대별(도서관1.0, 도서관2.0, 도서관3.0)로 파악하고자 하는 연구이다. 전술한 목적을 달성하기 위하여 본 연구에서는 대학도서관의 업무를 경영관리, 장서개발 및 관리, 자료조직, 이용서비스, 정보시스템 구축 및 관리의 5개 직무로 구분한 다음 각 직무별 세부 업무에 대하여 도서관 현장의 중견 사서 및 문헌정보학 분야의 교수들을 대상으로 2차례에 걸친 델파이조사를 실시하였다. 연구의 결과, 대학도서관의 업무가 참여, 공유, 개방(도서관2.0 시대)을 넘어서 소셜 네트워크, 시맨틱(도서관3.0 시대)의 개념이 적용되면서 업무의 수행 형태 및 요소에도 많은 변화가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 도서관2.0 시대에서 시작한 모바일, RFID, SNS, NFC 등 신기술의 발전에 따라 도서관3.0 시대에는 이용서비스에 대한 변화가 급격하게 이루어져서 이를 지원하는 도서관 시스템의 지속적인 업그레이드가 필요한 것으로 밝혀졌다.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the period-specific changes (Library 1.0, Library 2.0, Library 3.0 Period) of job factors and performance features in academic libraries. For this, the study categorized an academic library’s job into five dimensions: 1) library administration 2) collection development and management 3) information organization 4) information services and 5) information system development and management, After the categorized library’s job was defined in detail, the Delphi survey was conducted twice on librarians and professors of library and information science. The result showed that there were many changes in job factors and performance features in academic libraries towards the period of library 2.0 characterized by user participation, sharing and openness and into library 3.0 characterized by social network and semantic web. Library 3.0 is likely to bring about a significant change in user services with ever changing technological advances stemming from library 2.0, such as mobile services, RFID and NFC etc. The finding of the study suggest that library systems need to be continually upgraded in the period of library 3.0.