초록

국가적 차원의 연구 성과평가와 연구정보서비스의 연계를 위한 프레임워크를 메타데이터 표현과 교환의 두 가지 측면에서 모색하였다. 이를 위해 과학기술분야 연구개발사업을 대상으로 국가적 차원의 연구 성과평가 메타데이터의 기능적 요건을 도출하였고, 이에 기초하여 주요 기능별로 국제적인 표준의 적용 방안을 제안하였다. 또한 웹 아키텍처 상에서 연구정보를 재사용 및 교환할 수 있는 국제표준으로서 OAI-ORE에 기반하여 성과평가 메타데이터를 표현 및 연계하기 위한 구현 방안과 사례를 제시하였다.

Abstract

This study aims to investigate a framework for linkage of national research performance evaluation and research information service from the perspective of metadata representation and exchange. Based on results of the functional requirements for metadata of national research performance evaluation are derived, this study suggests strategies for the application of international metadata standards. Also, this study presents an method to implement the metadata of research performance evaluation based on OAI-ORE, which is an international standard that can reuse and exchange the research information on web architecture.

초록

Abstract

This study constructed an ontology targeting journal articles and evaluated its performance. Also, the performance of a triple structure ontology was compared with the knowledge base of an inverted index file designed for a simple keyword search engine. The coverage was three years of articles published in the Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management from 2007 to 2009. Protégé was used to construct an ontology, whilst utilizing an inverted index file to compare performance. The concept ontology was manually established, and the bibliography ontology was automatically constructed to produce an OWL concept ontology and an OWL bibliography ontology, respectively. This study compared the performance of the knowledge base of the ontology, using the Jena search engine with the performance of an inverted index file using the Lucene search engine. As a result, The Lucene showed higher precision rate, but Jena showed higher recall rate.

초록

Abstract

Despite the widespread use, critics claim that citation analysis has serious limitations in evaluating the research performance of scholars. First, conventional citation analysis methods yield one-dimensional and sometimes misleading evaluation as a result of not taking into account differences in citation quality, not filtering out citation noise such as self-citations, and not considering non-numeric aspects of citations such as language, culture, and time. Second, the citation database coverage of today is disjoint and incomplete, which can result in conflicting quality assessment outcomes across different data sources. This paper discuss the findings from a citation analysis study that measured the impact of scholarly publications based on the data mined from Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar, and briefly describes a work-in-progress prototype system called CiteSearch, which is designed to overcome the weaknesses of existing citation analysis methods with a robust citation-based quality assessment approach.

초록

본 연구는 최근 7년간 문헌정보학분야에 게재된 논문 1,752건을 대상으로 빈도 분석과 네트워크텍스트 분석을 실시하여 다양한 주제 개념의 분포와 그 관계성을 도출하였다. 더불어 보다 최근의 연구 경향을 분석하고 변화 양상을 살펴보기 위해, 최근 2년 사이에 연구된 482건을 추출하여 2차 분석을 실시하였다. 분석 결과, 최근 7년간 문헌정보학 분야는 “공공도서관”과 “대학도서관” 개념을 중심으로 하는 연구가 가장 높은 출현 빈도를 보였으며, “평가”, “교육”, “웹”은 가장 높은 연결 중심성을 나타내 다양한 문헌정보학의 주제 개념들과 관련을 맺고 연구되고 있는 개념으로 파악할 수 있었다. 최근 2년간을 대상으로 한 2차 분석 결과에서는 “웹”, “분류” 개념이 종전보다 높은 상대 빈도를 보였으며, 네트워크 텍스트 분석 결과에서는 “이용자” 연구와 “공공도서관” 개념이 종전보다 더 다양한 주제 개념들과 관련을 맺고 수행되고 있음을 확인할 수 있었다.

Abstract

In this study, Network Text Analysis was performed on 1,752 articles which had been published in recent 7 years and drew the subject concept distribution and their relations in Library and Information Science research areas. Furthermore, for analyzing more recent trends and changing aspects, this study performed secondary analysis based on 482 articles published in recent 2 years. Results show that “public library”, and “academic library” concepts were most frequently studied in the field and “evaluation”, “education”, and “web” concepts showed the highest-degree centrality during the recent 7 years. In the result of recent two years analysis, “web”, and “classification” concepts showed high frequency and “user”, and “public library” showed an improvement in high degree centrality.

초록

교수연구업적을 보다 효과적으로 평가하기 위해서는 연구의 정량 및 정성적 측면을 고려하여야 한다. 본 연구에서는 연구의 양적 측면을 보여주는 논문 수와 질적 측면을 반영하는 피인용 수에 의한 국내 문헌정보학과 교수의 연구업적 평가순위를 국내 대학에서 사용되는 연구업적 평가규정을 적용한 순위와 비교․분석하였다. 연구결과, 논문 수에 의한 교수별 순위가 피인용 수에 의한 순위와 차이가 있으며, 대학별 교수 업적평가는 피인용 수보다는 논문 수에 의한 평가와 가까운 것으로 나타났다. 또한 대학별 상이한 논문 배점기준은 교수업적평가 결과에 별다른 영향을 끼치지 않았다. 향후 연구에서는 연구의 양적 및 질적 수준을 보다 잘 반영하는 계량서지학적 지표에 관한 연구가 진행되어야 할 것으로 본다.

Abstract

Effective assessment of faculty research performance should involve considerations of both quality and quantity of faculty research. This study analyzed methods for evaluating faculty research output by comparing the rankings of Library and Information Science(LIS) faculty by publication counts, citation counts, and research performance assessment guidelines employed by Korean universities. The study results indicated that faculty rankings based on publication counts to be significantly different from those based on citation counts. Additionally, faculty rankings measured by university guidelines showed bigger correlations with rankings based on publication counts than rankings by citation counts, while differences in universities guidelines did not significantly affect the faculty rankings. The study findings suggest the need for bibliometric indicators that reflect the quality as well as the quantity of research output.