초록

본 연구에서는 KISTI 콘텐츠 큐레이션 센터의 업무를 중심으로 콘텐츠 라이프 사이클에 맞는 큐레이션 모델인 KISTI CLCM을 개발하였다. 이를 위해 앞서 개발된 모델 DCC, DCC&U, UC3, DCN 모델 등을 살펴보고, 디지털 큐레이션 센터의 업무와 연결되는 모델들의 장점을 도출하였다. KISTI 콘텐츠 큐레이션 센터의 업무담당자들과의 집단 면담을 통해 센터에서 다루는 콘텐츠의 특징을 파악하고 현 업무의 성취정도를 확인하였다. 또한 본 연구에서는 UC3 모델을 기반으로 KISTI 콘텐츠 큐레이션 웨이브를 개발하여 이용자 중심의 서비스를 발굴하고 디지털 자원에 새로운 가치를 추가하여 활용성을 높일 수 있는 방안을 제시하였다.

Abstract

This study developed KISTI CLCM, a curation model suitable for the content life cycle, focusing on the KISTI Content Curation Center. For developing the KISTI Curation Model, the previously developed models DCC, DCC&U, UC3 and DCN models were reviewed and the advantages of the models connected to the mission and tasks of the digital curation center were derived. Interviews with staffs of the KISTI Content Curation Center identified the characteristics of the content and identified the level of achievement of the current task. In addition, this study proposed to enhance usability by developing KISTI content curation waves based on the UC3 model to discover user-centered services and add new values to digital resources.

초록

Abstract

A large and reliable citation database is necessary to identify and analyze citation behavior of Korean researchers in science and technology. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI) built the Korea Science Citation Database (KSCD), and have provided Korea Science Citation Index (KSCI) and Korea Journal Citation Reports (KJCR) services. In this article, citing behavior of Korean scientists on Korean journals was examined by using the KSCD that covers 459 Korean core journals. This research dealt with (1) statistical numeric information of journals in KSCD, (2) analysis of document types cited, (3) ratio of domestic to international documents cited and ratio of citing different disciplines, (4) analysis on immediacy index, peak time, and half-life of cited documents, and (5) analysis on impact of journals based on KJCR citation indicators. From this research, we could find the immediacy citation rate (average 2.36%), peak-time (average 1.7 years) and half-life (average 5.2 years) of cited journals in Korea. We also found that the average journal self-citation rate is more than 50% in every field. In sum, citing behavior of Korean scientists on Korean journals was comprehensively identified from this research.

초록

Abstract

There have been little comprehensive research for studying impact of foreign journals on Korean scientists. The main reason for this is because there was no extensive citation index database of domestic journals for analysis. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI) built the Korea Science Citation Database (KSCD), and have provided Korea Science Citation Index (KSCI) and Korea Journal Citation Reports (KJCR) services. In this article, citing behavior of Korean scientists on foreign journals was examined by using KSCD that covers Korean core journals. This research covers (1) analysis of foreign document types cited, (2) analysis of citation counts of foreign journals by subject and the ratio of citing different disciplines, (3) analysis of language and country of foreign documents cited, (4) analysis of publishers of journals and whether or not journals are listed on global citation index services and (5) analysis for current situation of subscribing to foreign electronic journals in Korea. The results of this research would be useful for establishing strategies for licensing foreign electronic journals and for information services. From this research, immediacy citation rate (average 1.46%), peak-time (average 3.9 years) and half-life (average 8 years) of cited foreign journals were identified. It was also found that Korean scientistis tend to cite journals covered in SCI(E) or SCOPUS, and 90% of cited foreign journals have been licensed by institutions in Korea.

초록

본 연구는 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI)에서 개발하고 있는 국가연구데이터커먼즈(KRDC)를 실제 이용할 국가과학기술연구회(NST) 산하 정부출연연구기관의 연구데이터 관리자를 대상으로 연구데이터를 분석하기 위한 인프라와 서비스의 현황을 파악하고, KRDC 체계 구축과 관련한 연구데이터 관리자들의 인식을 조사하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 이를 위해 KISTI를 제외한 24개의 정부출연연구기관을 대상으로 설문을 실시하였으며, 설문조사에 응답한 15개 기관 중 후속 인터뷰에 동의한 9개 기관의 연구데이터 관리자를 대상으로 인터뷰를 수행하였다. 설문 결과, 대부분의 기관들이 관련 서비스를 제공하고 있었으며, 연구데이터 활용을 위한 통합 분석 프레임워크의 도입과 외부에 공개된 분석 SW를 사용할 수 있는 체제에 대한 제공 의향 역시 높은 것으로 나타났다. 한편 후속 인터뷰를 통해 각 기관별로 제공하는 분석 서비스의 외부 공개 현황을 파악해보았을 때, 매우 소수의 기관만이 이를 외부에 공개하고 있었다. 이러한 연구 결과를 분석해보면, 프레임워크를 통해 분석 인프라와 서비스가 제공될 경우 활용하고자 하는 수요가 있으나, 각 기관에서 보유하고 있는 분석 자원을 공개 및 공유하기 어렵다는 것을 알 수 있다. KRDC 체계 구축을 위해서는 연구 현장에서의 분석 인프라와 분석 서비스의 공유가 필수적인 만큼 연구 현장에서의 인식 전환, 나아가 제도적 변화가 필요하며, 후속 인터뷰에서 제시된 시스템의 편리성, 보안, 보상체계 등을 잘 고려하는 정책을 수립하기 위해 노력할 필요가 있다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the current status of infrastructure and services for analyzing research data for research data managers at government-funded research institutions under the National Research Council for Science and Technology (NST) who will actually use the Korea Research Data Commons (KRDC), which is being developed by the Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI) and to investigate the perceptions of research data managers related to the establishment of KRDC system. For the study, we conducted a survey targeting 24 government-funded research institutes, excluding KISTI, and interviewed research data managers from 9 of the 15 institutions surveyed who agreed to follow-up interviews. As a result of the survey, most institutions were providing related services, and their willingness to introduce an integrated analysis framework for the use of research data and provide a system for using externally released analysis software was also high. Meanwhile, when we investigated the external disclosure status of each institution’s analysis services through follow-up interviews, only a minimal number of institutions were disclosing them to the outside world. The findings reveal that there is a demand to utilize analysis infrastructure and services when provided through the framework. However, it is difficult to disclose and share the analysis resources held by each organization. In order to establish the KRDC system, it is essential to share research sites’ analysis infrastructure and services, and in addition, changes in the perception of research sites and institutional changes are necessary. Furthermore, there is a need to establish policies that consider the system’s convenience, security, and compensation system raised in the follow-up interviews.