초록

불리언 검색만을 제공하는 정보시스템들은 순위화된 검색 결과를 제공하지 않아 이용자들이 많은 시간을 들여 수많은 결과를 일일이 확인해야하는 단점이 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 불리언 검색 모델의 단점을 극복하기 위한 방법으로써 불리언 검색에서 적용되고 있는 색인 가중치 정보 대신에 태그 간의 결합 관계 정보를 이용하여 순위화된 검색 결과를 제공하기 위한 시스템을 제안한다. 본 연구에서 제안하고 있는 방법은 일반적인 키워드 질의 대신에 문서를 질의로 사용하기 때문에 해당 문서에서 질의로 사용하는 핵심태그를 추출한다. 질의 생성 과정에서는 태그결합도에 따라 다양한 그룹의 불리언 질의를 생성하고, 매칭 과정에서는 해당 질의어 그룹 간에 차별성 정보와 태그 중요도 정보를 이용하여 순위화를 처리한다. 본 연구에서 제안하고 있는 방법의 유용성을 평가하기 위하여 선정된 연구정보와 관련된 동향분석정보를 추출하는 과정에 적용하여 실험을 수행하였다. 또한 제안된 방법에 대한 이용자 평가를 위하여 다수의 이용자들을 대상으로 약 1년간 서비스를 제공하였으며 그 결과 높은 이용자 만족도를 확보할 수 있다고 조사되었다.

Abstract

Since IR systems which adopt only Boolean IR model can not provide ranked search result, users have to conduct time-consuming checking process for huge result sets one by one. This study proposes a method to provide search results ranked by using coupling information between tags instead of index weight information in Boolean IR model. Because document queries are used instead of general user queries in the proposed method, key tags used as queries in a relevant document are extracted. A variety of groups of Boolean queries based on tag couplings are created in the process of extracting queries. Ranked search result can be extracted through the process of matching conducted with differential information among the query groups and tag significance information. To prove the usability of the proposed method, the experiment was conducted to find research trend analysis information on selected research information. Aslo, the service based on the proposed methods was provided to get user feedback for a year. The result showed high user satisfaction.

초록

Abstract

Although it has been a long subject of study why researchers prefer some cited documents to others, the existing relative researches have had a variety of perspectives on the nature and complexity of the citation behavior and not provided a complete answer to this question. In particular, Korea researchers mainly used statistical analysis of bibliographic information, which has limitations in revealing dynamic and complex cognitive aspects of the citation process. In this study, I investigate the citer perception of citing motives and bibliographic factors through survey and compared the responses according to the researchers’ characteristics. After extracting the 22 motivations and 21 factors through the literature analysis and configuring a 5-point Likert scale questions, I conducted a survey in the wat of an e-mail attachment. From the SPSS 22.0, the frequency analysis, t-test, and one-way ANOVA were performed on the 354 valid samples. As a result, it is found that supporting is considered the most important citing motive and social connection, self-citation have little influence. In the case of bibliographic factors, the journal’s reputation was recognized the most influential factor and the number of pages and authors was the least. Significant differences in fields of study and research careers were showed in some parts. These results can substantiate earlier studies, determine whether the factors assumed influential in selecting references were intended, and suggest the search point to the specialty library or academic database.