초록

Abstract

Although it has been a long subject of study why researchers prefer some cited documents to others, the existing relative researches have had a variety of perspectives on the nature and complexity of the citation behavior and not provided a complete answer to this question. In particular, Korea researchers mainly used statistical analysis of bibliographic information, which has limitations in revealing dynamic and complex cognitive aspects of the citation process. In this study, I investigate the citer perception of citing motives and bibliographic factors through survey and compared the responses according to the researchers’ characteristics. After extracting the 22 motivations and 21 factors through the literature analysis and configuring a 5-point Likert scale questions, I conducted a survey in the wat of an e-mail attachment. From the SPSS 22.0, the frequency analysis, t-test, and one-way ANOVA were performed on the 354 valid samples. As a result, it is found that supporting is considered the most important citing motive and social connection, self-citation have little influence. In the case of bibliographic factors, the journal’s reputation was recognized the most influential factor and the number of pages and authors was the least. Significant differences in fields of study and research careers were showed in some parts. These results can substantiate earlier studies, determine whether the factors assumed influential in selecting references were intended, and suggest the search point to the specialty library or academic database.

초록

오늘날 폭발적인 정보의 증가로 이용자들은 자신이 원하는 정보를 찾기 위해 엄청난 시간과 노력을 기울여야 한다. 이 문제를 해결하기 위하여 이용자의 정보요구를 분석하고 이용자에게 적합한 논문을 추천해주는 논문추천시스템이 등장하고 있다. 그러나 대부분의 논문추천시스템은 논문추천시스템의 핵심인 이용자 프로파일을 간과하고 있다. 따라서 이 연구는 논문추천시스템의 성능을 좌우하는 이용자 프로파일을 기존의 평균으로 계산하지 않고 새로운 TPIPF(Topic Proportion-Inverse Paper Frequency)로 계산하는 방법을 제안하였다. 제안된 방법과 기존의 방법을 모두 논문추천시스템에 적용하여 각각의 성능을 온라인 참고문헌 관리도구인 CiteULike에서 제공된 데이터 실험을 통하여 비교하였다. 그 결과 제안된 TPIPF 방법을 적용한 논문추천시스템의 성능이 더 높다는 것을 알 수 있었다.

Abstract

Nowadays users spend more time and effort to find what they want because of information overload. To solve the problem, scientific article recommendation system analyse users’ needs and recommend them proper articles. However, most of the scientific article recommendation systems neglected the core part, user profile. Therefore, in this paper, instead of mean which applied in user profile in previous studies, New TPIPF (Topic Proportion-Inverse Paper Frequency) was applied to scientific article recommendation system. Moreover, the accuracy of two scientific article recommendation systems with above different methods was compared with experiments of public dataset from online reference manager, CiteULike. As a result, the proposed scientific article recommendation system with TPIPF was proven to be better.

초록

본 연구는 대학도서관 정보서비스 연구동향을 살펴보고자 함이 목적이며 이를 수행하기 위하여 2006년부터 2015년까지 문헌정보학 주요 4개 학회지에 발표된 대학도서관 정보서비스 논문을 대상으로 내용분석을 실시하였다. 조사항목으로는 대학도서관 정보서비스 연구 건수, 정보서비스 기능별 하위 주제, 연구방법, 자료수집방법, 연구 이용자 대상 그리고 이론 연구 vs. 실제 서비스 연구이다. 연구결과, 대학도서관 대상의 정보서비스 연구는 다른 분야에 비해 많은 연구가 이루어졌다. 정보서비스 기능에서는 정보제공 기능이, 하위 주제별로는 전자정보서비스, 정보활용교육, 정보(참고)봉사 일반에 관한 연구가 주를 이루고 있었다. 연구방법으로는 조사연구, 사례연구가 주로 사용되었으며 자료수집방법으로는 질문지와 웹사이트 방법이 많이 사용되었다. 학부생 대상의 이용자 연구가 많았으며 실제 서비스 연구가 많은 비중을 차지하였다.

Abstract

With the purpose of looking into the information service study tendency, targeted at university library, this performed a content analysis of the articles in print from 2006 to 2015 on major four academic journals of Library and Information Science. Investigation items were study number of information services, subsidiary themes classified with information service functions, study method, collection method, user object, and theory study vs. service study in reality. As a result, information service studies were performed more than other areas. Information service functions targeted at the study were that of information supply. Major subsidiary themes were electronic information service, information literacy instruction, and information (reference) services general. Major study methods were survey research method,, case study, and major material collection methods were questionnaire and web-based research methods. Major user studies were targeted at undergraduates, and service study in reality took a great share.