초록

Cited-by Linking 서비스는 CrossRef에서 제공하는 주요 서비스 중 하나로 해당 논문이 DOI를 통하여 얼마나 인용되었는지 누적하여 집계된 데이터이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 KISTI의 학술정보통합관리시스템에서 월단위로 구축․관리하는 Cited-by Linking 데이터를 분석하여 자연과학과 공학 분야의 인용 패턴을 규명하고자 하였다. 이를 위해서 전체 기탁된 21만 건 중 자연과학과 공학 분야 총 170,999건(315종)을 분석 대상으로 하고, 2016년 3월까지 누적된 Cited-by Linking 데이터를 수집하였다. 연구의 분석 결과, 첫째, 글로벌하게 인용될 가능성에서 사용 언어는 영향을 미치고 있으며, 둘째, SCIE 및 SCOPUS 등재 여부 역시 인용가능성에 상당 부분 기여하고 있음을 확인하였다. 셋째, 자연과학 분야는 거의 동일한 주제 분야에서 인용을 받고 있으며, 상대적으로 공학 분야는 타주제 분야에서 더 인용 받고 있음을 파악하였다. 이러한 연구의 결과는 자연과학과 공학 분야의 세부주제 분야별 인용 행태를 규명하고, 향후, 인용 행태에 관한 연구에서 유용하게 활용될 것으로 기대한다.

Abstract

Cited-by Linking Service is one of the CrossRef’s information services that allows you to discover how your publications are being cited and to incorporate that information into your online publication platform. This study tries to investigate citation patterns in the field of both Natural Science and Engineering using all of DOI assigned articles and Cited-by Linking data which are accumulated and managed by KISTI. The investigating approach is designed to verify the theory of 1) cognitive accessibility, 2) ‘perceived quality and significance’ and 3) ‘subject relativity’. For cognitive accessibility verification the fulltext language portion of Korean and English between “Cited DOI Source Data” and “NOT Cited DOI Source Data” was compared. For perceived quality and significance verification the availability of the “Cited DOI Source Data” and “NOT Cited DOI Source Data” from SCIE and SCOPUS was employed. For subject relativity DOI data were classified and analysed on the basis of OECD subject classification scheme. Findings are that global citability is closely related to the fulltext language of the articles and their quality and significance. And in the natural science field most of citations are from the same subject categories, while relatively more citations are from other subject categories in the engineering field.

초록

이 연구에서는 우리나라 토목공학분야 연구자들이 참조하는 정보원의 유형을 인용분석을 통해 조사하였다. 분석 결과는 다음과 같다. 1)주요 인용정보원은 학술지(55.7%)와 단행본(15.6%)과 회의자료(10.2%) 순이었다. 2)출판 후 10년 이내(26.1%)의 문헌을 가장 많이 인용하였다. 3)핵심학술지는 국내학술지였으며, 상위권 핵심학술지 선호도에서도 국내와 국외문헌의 의존도가 유사하였다. 4)최신자료의 경우 국내문헌을, 출판 이후 경과시간이 오래된 자료의 경우 국외문헌을 선호하였다. 5)국내외 모든 핵심학술지들이 영향력 지수와 즉시성 지수의 값이 동시에 높게 나타나지 않았다.

Abstract

This study analyzes types of primary sources cited by South Korean civil engineers. The results are as follows: 1) primary sources by preference are academic journal (55.7%), book (15.6%), seminar contents (10.2%). 2) documents published within last 10 years (26.1%) are cited most often. 3) domestic journal is the primary academic journal cited, and the finding is similar in preference of top-ranked primary reference (domestic and foreign combined). 4) In terms of time, domestic sources are preferred for up-to-date publications, and foreign sources for relatively non-recent publications. 5) The indices of influence and extemporaneity for both domestic and foreign sources do not show high numbers simultaneously.

초록

Abstract

Although it has been a long subject of study why researchers prefer some cited documents to others, the existing relative researches have had a variety of perspectives on the nature and complexity of the citation behavior and not provided a complete answer to this question. In particular, Korea researchers mainly used statistical analysis of bibliographic information, which has limitations in revealing dynamic and complex cognitive aspects of the citation process. In this study, I investigate the citer perception of citing motives and bibliographic factors through survey and compared the responses according to the researchers’ characteristics. After extracting the 22 motivations and 21 factors through the literature analysis and configuring a 5-point Likert scale questions, I conducted a survey in the wat of an e-mail attachment. From the SPSS 22.0, the frequency analysis, t-test, and one-way ANOVA were performed on the 354 valid samples. As a result, it is found that supporting is considered the most important citing motive and social connection, self-citation have little influence. In the case of bibliographic factors, the journal’s reputation was recognized the most influential factor and the number of pages and authors was the least. Significant differences in fields of study and research careers were showed in some parts. These results can substantiate earlier studies, determine whether the factors assumed influential in selecting references were intended, and suggest the search point to the specialty library or academic database.

초록

Abstract

There have been little comprehensive research for studying impact of foreign journals on Korean scientists. The main reason for this is because there was no extensive citation index database of domestic journals for analysis. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI) built the Korea Science Citation Database (KSCD), and have provided Korea Science Citation Index (KSCI) and Korea Journal Citation Reports (KJCR) services. In this article, citing behavior of Korean scientists on foreign journals was examined by using KSCD that covers Korean core journals. This research covers (1) analysis of foreign document types cited, (2) analysis of citation counts of foreign journals by subject and the ratio of citing different disciplines, (3) analysis of language and country of foreign documents cited, (4) analysis of publishers of journals and whether or not journals are listed on global citation index services and (5) analysis for current situation of subscribing to foreign electronic journals in Korea. The results of this research would be useful for establishing strategies for licensing foreign electronic journals and for information services. From this research, immediacy citation rate (average 1.46%), peak-time (average 3.9 years) and half-life (average 8 years) of cited foreign journals were identified. It was also found that Korean scientistis tend to cite journals covered in SCI(E) or SCOPUS, and 90% of cited foreign journals have been licensed by institutions in Korea.

초록

과학이 기술발전을 이끄는 주요 추진력이며 기술혁신이 궁극적으로 경제발전에 기여한다는 것이 밝혀짐에 따라 선진국은 과학과 기술간 상호작용을 중요하게 다루고 있다. 그러나 한국의 기술발전을 이끈 과학적 기반에 관한 연구가 거의 이루어지지 않았으며 한국의 기술과 강력한 연계를 맺고 있는 학문분야에 대한 연구도 미약한 실정이다. 따라서 이 연구는 특허에 인용된 과학논문을 이용하여 과학기술자의 인용행태를 추적하고, 인용행태 이면에 놓인 과학과 기술간 상호작용을 측정하고자 하였다. 과학논문이 특허의 혁신가치에 어떠한 영향을 미치고 있는지를 살펴봄으로써 기술개발에 있어 과학논문의 중요도를 밝히고자 하였다.

Abstract

As the fact that science is the driving force behind technological development and that technological innovation contributes to economic development has been proved empirically convincing, the interaction between science and technology is highly emphasized in advanced countries. But, Korea has not been active in conducting research on science-based technological development and on the scientific fields that have strong relationships with Korean technology. This study attempts to explore the influence of scientific research papers cited in US patents by Koreans on other US patents and identify the interactions between scientific research papers and patents, by examining the scientific references cited in the Korean-originated US patents.

초록

Abstract

A large and reliable citation database is necessary to identify and analyze citation behavior of Korean researchers in science and technology. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI) built the Korea Science Citation Database (KSCD), and have provided Korea Science Citation Index (KSCI) and Korea Journal Citation Reports (KJCR) services. In this article, citing behavior of Korean scientists on Korean journals was examined by using the KSCD that covers 459 Korean core journals. This research dealt with (1) statistical numeric information of journals in KSCD, (2) analysis of document types cited, (3) ratio of domestic to international documents cited and ratio of citing different disciplines, (4) analysis on immediacy index, peak time, and half-life of cited documents, and (5) analysis on impact of journals based on KJCR citation indicators. From this research, we could find the immediacy citation rate (average 2.36%), peak-time (average 1.7 years) and half-life (average 5.2 years) of cited journals in Korea. We also found that the average journal self-citation rate is more than 50% in every field. In sum, citing behavior of Korean scientists on Korean journals was comprehensively identified from this research.

초록

본 연구는 우리나라 정보학 연구자들의 연구 논문과 이곳에 인용된 문헌을 조사, 분석하여 우리나라 정보학의 연구 동향을 밝힌 것이다. 이를 위해 조사 대상 학술지를 정보관리학회지로 선정하였고, 조사 대상 기간은 1984-2004년(창간호-제21권 제3호)이다. 조사 대상 학술지에 발표된 연구 논문과 이곳에 인용된 외국 문헌정보학 문헌의 주제 분석을 위하여 본 연구는 먼저 정보학의 주제 영역을 설정하였고, 연구 논문 302편의 주제 및 간행 시기별 분포를 조사, 분석하였으며, 인용된 외국 문헌정보학 문헌 3,270편과 타 학문분야 문헌 2,492편의 주제 및 연령을 각각 조사, 분석하였다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate a trend of research in the field of information science in Korea. For this purpose, the study analyzed the subject of each citing and cited articles appeared in the ‘Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management’ 302 original articles appeared in the journal from 1984 to 2004 were analyzed. 3,270 foreign literatures of library and information science field being cited in the original articles and those 2,492 cited foreign literatures of other field then library and information science were analyzed by subject, by publication year, and by citing age.