초록

Abstract

Physicians have information needs related to academic research and clinical practice but encounter difficulties seeking appropriate medical resources and information. The goal of this study is to develop a search system to support Korean physicians’ information needs. To access sources to meet the identified need, in-depth interviews were conducted, and MediSearching, a new search system, was developed accordingly. To verify its usefulness and to obtain users’ suggestions, interviews were conducted and feedback was solicited via collected test searches. The initial set of interviews indicated that physicians’ information needs and search behaviors differed by type of hospital and clinical department. Physicians in university hospitals with a greater need for research materials searched for academic articles, whereas physicians in specialty hospitals or primary care clinics with a stronger need for materials related to clinical practice asked their colleagues for information. Consequently, MediSearching was designed to satisfy both groups’ needs, and the test search provided useful search results compared with existing services. Korean physicians have previously had to repeat their search process on separate sites that provide different services according to type of information and search method. MediSearching may reduce this inconvenience and add documents in various formats and languages.

초록

음성을 통해 상품을 구매하는 음성쇼핑 서비스는 미래에 본격적으로 상용화될 것으로 예상된다. 본 연구에서는 음성쇼핑이 세계적으로 일상이 될 미래를 대비하여 디스플레이 탑재형 음성 인터페이스를 활용한 음성쇼핑 서비스 휴리스틱을 개발하였다. 첫째, 이론적 접근으로 ‘시각 인터페이스’, ‘음성 인터페이스’, ‘쇼핑 서비스’의 설계 원칙을 주제로 한 논문 50건을 읽고 문헌조사를 실시하여 총 29개의 설계 원칙 초안을 제작하였다. 둘째, 실증적 접근으로 소비자 의사결정과정에 따른 쇼핑 경험 및 쇼핑 맥락에서의 정보추구행위에 관한 포커스 그룹 인터뷰를 진행하여 문헌 연구에서 미흡했던 분야인 이용자 경험 측면을 보완한 휴리스틱 초안을 작성하였다. 셋째, 델파이 조사를 통해 위의 두 단계를 거쳐 개발된 휴리스틱 초안에 대하여 20명의 UX, 서비스기획, 인공지능 개발, 쇼핑 분야 전문가들에게 전문가 평가를 해줄 것을 요청하였다. 3회에 걸친 델파이 조사를 통해 최종 휴리스틱을 제안하였다.

Abstract

Voice shopping is gaining attention following the trend of non-contact E-commerce by enabling people to shop via voice command. Therefore, in this study, voice shopping service heuristics using a display-mounted voice interface were developed in preparation for the future where voice shopping becomes a part of daily life in the world. First, as a theoretical approach, a literature survey of 50 papers on the design principles of ‘visual interface,’ ‘voice interface,’ and ‘shopping service’ was conducted to produce a total of 29 draft design principles. Second, as an empirical approach, a focus group interview was conducted on consumer decision-making processes in shopping experiences and information-seeking behavior within the context of shopping to draft the heuristics. This was to supplement the user experience, a weak part of the literature research. Finally, a Delphi survey asked 20 experts in UX, service planning, artificial intelligence development, and shopping to evaluate the heuristics draft developed through the above two stages. After three rounds of Delphi surveys, the final heuristics were proposed.

초록

이 연구는 입지선정 과정에서 다양한 집단의 의사를 반영하고 객관성 있는 입지후보지를 선정하는 방법을 제시하고자 하였다. 제안하는 도서관 입지선정 모형은 입지기준의 중요도를 측정하는 계층분석법과 구체적인 입지를 선정하는 지리정보시스템을 통해서 이루어졌고 이를 서초구에 적용하였다. 먼저, 문헌연구를 통해 도서관 입지기준을 설정하였고 설정된 기준을 계층화하였다. 계층화된 기준 중에서 서초구 환경에 적합한 기준을 추출하여 설문지를 작성하였고 이를 도서관 이용자, 전문가, 행정 공무원의 세 집단을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시했다. 일관성을 유지하고 있는 설문만을 분석하여 각 기준들의 상대적인 중요도를 측정하였다. 다음으로, 도서관 입지 배제지역을 설정하였고 입지기준들의 지도 레이어를 작성하였다. 레이어를 설문을 통해 얻은 각 기준의 상대적인 중요도를 가중치로 하여 중첩함으로써 75개 후보지를 선정하였다. 선정된 후보지들을 기준별 유사도에 따라 5개의 클러스터로 군집화했고 적합도가 낮은 한 개의 군집을 제외한 네 개의 후보지를 최종 입지후보지로 제시했다.

Abstract

This study proposes a new site selection model which reflects integrated opinions of several groups and identifies sites through objectivity of selection procedure. The proposed model consists of two parts, Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) and Geographic Information(GIS). This model was applied to Seocho-gu in Seoul. First, library site selection criteria were determined through literature study. Hierarchical relationship based on the questionnaire was determined and refined to be suited to Seocho-gu case. A survey was conducted with three groups, namely, library users, librarians, and public worker. A few inconsistent answers to the survey questionnaire were excluded and the relative importance of each criterion was measured. Next, an overlay method was used and the relative importance was used as a weight for selecting candidates. This process excluded the areas where a library was unable to be built, for example, rivers, military areas, other restricted areas by law, etc. and resulted in seventy-five sites. Five groups of candidates were identified according to the similarity of criteria. Finally, four groups, after eliminating one lowly fitted group, were determined.