바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

검색어: 사서 2.0, 검색결과: 2
1
신수연(University of Pittsburgh) ; 김성민(University of Pittsburgh) 2010, Vol.27, No.2, pp.201-216 https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.2.201
초록보기
초록

Abstract

The idea of Library 2.0 originated from the concept of Web 2.0 social interactions within the Web. From this aspect, Library 2.0 is a library blended with Web 2.0. The most remarkable features of Library 2.0 are interactions and user involvement. Users' roles in new library environments are greater since they can contribute to establishing a library collection by annotating, blogging, reviewing, etc. While users’ roles become important, the responsibilities of the librarians increase due to the unfiltered information created by users. Librarians now should extend their roles as information creators, organizers, providers, managers, as well as moderators. In this paper, we reviewed the current literature on the new paradigm of digital libraries, Library 2.0, and the development of Library 2.0. In addition, we discuss the extended role of the Librarian 2.0 in Library 2.0.

초록보기
초록

본 연구는 대학도서관 업무의 수행 형태와 요소의 변화를 시대별(도서관1.0, 도서관2.0, 도서관3.0)로 파악하고자 하는 연구이다. 전술한 목적을 달성하기 위하여 본 연구에서는 대학도서관의 업무를 경영관리, 장서개발 및 관리, 자료조직, 이용서비스, 정보시스템 구축 및 관리의 5개 직무로 구분한 다음 각 직무별 세부 업무에 대하여 도서관 현장의 중견 사서 및 문헌정보학 분야의 교수들을 대상으로 2차례에 걸친 델파이조사를 실시하였다. 연구의 결과, 대학도서관의 업무가 참여, 공유, 개방(도서관2.0 시대)을 넘어서 소셜 네트워크, 시맨틱(도서관3.0 시대)의 개념이 적용되면서 업무의 수행 형태 및 요소에도 많은 변화가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 도서관2.0 시대에서 시작한 모바일, RFID, SNS, NFC 등 신기술의 발전에 따라 도서관3.0 시대에는 이용서비스에 대한 변화가 급격하게 이루어져서 이를 지원하는 도서관 시스템의 지속적인 업그레이드가 필요한 것으로 밝혀졌다.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the period-specific changes (Library 1.0, Library 2.0, Library 3.0 Period) of job factors and performance features in academic libraries. For this, the study categorized an academic library’s job into five dimensions: 1) library administration 2) collection development and management 3) information organization 4) information services and 5) information system development and management, After the categorized library’s job was defined in detail, the Delphi survey was conducted twice on librarians and professors of library and information science. The result showed that there were many changes in job factors and performance features in academic libraries towards the period of library 2.0 characterized by user participation, sharing and openness and into library 3.0 characterized by social network and semantic web. Library 3.0 is likely to bring about a significant change in user services with ever changing technological advances stemming from library 2.0, such as mobile services, RFID and NFC etc. The finding of the study suggest that library systems need to be continually upgraded in the period of library 3.0.

정보관리학회지